Video Highlight Ranking for Specific Duration and Event Labels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manually generating video highlights is time-consuming and prone to human error, especially when specific durations and types are required, making the process inefficient and unreliable.

Innovation Solution

A system and method using a pre-configured ranking neural network (RankNet) to automatically generate video highlights of a specific duration by splitting videos into fragments, ranking them, and selecting fragments based on spatio-temporal encoding to meet the desired duration and type criteria.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual fragmenting is used to create video highlights, then the highlights can be customized with specific duration and content type, but the process becomes time-consuming and tedious

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization of highlight duration and content typeVSAvoidtime required for manual fragmenting
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of video fragmenting with an automated computer-based system. The system automatically divides video into fragments, scores them using machine learning models, and assembles highlights without human intervention, thus eliminating the time-consuming manual operation while maintaining customization capabilities through programmable parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically evaluating and selecting video fragments based on pre-defined criteria and scoring mechanisms. The automated scoring system independently identifies important moments without requiring human judgment, enabling the system to serve itself in the highlight generation process while adhering to specified duration and content type requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual assessment by experts is used to identify important fragments, then the highlights can be accurate and reliable, but the process becomes human-dependent and prone to human errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of highlight selectionVSAvoiddependency on human expertise
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces human expert assessment with automated machine learning-based scoring systems. Multiple models including action recognition models, event detection models, and ranking models work together to objectively evaluate video fragments, eliminating human dependency and reducing subjective errors while maintaining or improving selection accuracy through consistent algorithmic evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where scoring results from multiple models are aggregated and used to iteratively improve fragment selection. The ranking model receives feedback from action recognition and event detection models, adjusting fragment scores based on cumulative evidence, which enhances reliability through multi-layered validation rather than single human judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual selection of clips and duration is used, then the highlights can be tailored to specific objectives, but the process becomes complicated and less reliable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetailoring highlights to specific objectivesVSAvoidconsistency of highlight generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains adaptability by allowing users to set various parameters such as target duration, fragment length, and scoring thresholds. These parameters can be adjusted based on different objectives (e.g., sports highlights vs. news clips), while the automated processing ensures consistent and reliable results regardless of parameter settings, eliminating the variability introduced by manual judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-training multiple machine learning models on domain-specific data before actual highlight generation. Action recognition models are trained on sport-specific actions, event detection models are prepared with domain knowledge, ensuring that when highlights are generated for specific objectives, the system already has the necessary expertise built-in, making the process both adaptable and reliable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12579810B2System and method for automatic events identification on video
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 SIT AUTONOMOUS AG
  • US12579810B2 patent drawing
  • US12579810B2 patent drawing
  • US12579810B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for generating video highlights with a certain label and a specific duration (SD) using a trained ranking neural network (RankNet). The system obtains a request for highlight generation, specific duration, and a specific label. The video is split into a set of fragments of pre-defined duration forming a sequence. Digital representation in a form of 3D spatio-temporal embedding is generated for each fragment by a spatio-temporal encoder. Using the embedding value, a rank of each fragment is identified by a trained Ranking Neural Network. Ranks are recorded into a data structure. A minimum number of fragments are selected to cover the SD using a criteria comprising comparing ranks of different fragments. A video highlight is generated from concatenated selected fragments with a truncation, if necessary.