Video Generation Model Transfer for Low-Label Photorealistic Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing AI-based video generation models require large amounts of accurate labeled data, which is expensive, time-consuming, and prone to inconsistency, making it difficult to train models effectively with limited data.

Innovation Solution

A method involving training a video generation model by leveraging a first image generation model for a virtual domain style and a second image generation model for a real-world domain style, using a pre-trained video generation model with spatial and temporal attention layers, and employing a label interpolation model to enhance frame rate, allowing generation of photorealistic videos with a small amount of labeled data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual labeling is used to create accurate labeled data, then data accuracy is improved, but cost and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeled data accuracyVSAvoidlabeling time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses synthetic data generated by image generation models to create labeled video data. Instead of manually labeling real videos, the system generates synthetic video frames and their corresponding labels through AI models, copying the labeling function to automated synthesis processes. This resolves the contradiction by providing accurate labels without manual time investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs self-supervised learning where the model generates its own training data and labels. The image generation model creates synthetic video frames and automatically provides ground truth labels, allowing the system to serve its own labeling needs without external human annotators. This eliminates both cost and time constraints of manual labeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If auto labeling is used to reduce cost and time, then efficiency is improved, but labeling accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling efficiencyVSAvoidlabeled data accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where synthetic labels generated by the image generation model are used to train the video generation model. The system continuously refines its labeling through iterative training processes, where the model learns from synthetic data and improves its labeling accuracy over time. This feedback loop resolves the accuracy-efficiency contradiction by automating labeling while maintaining quality through continuous learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary synthetic data generation layer between the input video and the training labels. Instead of directly labeling real videos (manual) or using imperfect auto-labels, the system uses a synthetic data generator as an intermediary that creates intermediate representations with ground truth labels. This intermediary layer enables both efficiency and accuracy by bridging the gap between raw data and training labels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If photorealistic video generation is achieved using real-labeled data, then video quality is improved, but data collection difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo generation qualityVSAvoidlabeled data collection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent copies real video data into synthetic video data generated by image generation models. Instead of collecting and labeling real videos, the system generates synthetic versions that replicate the visual characteristics and temporal patterns of real videos. This copying approach maintains video generation quality while eliminating the difficulty of collecting and annotating real-world data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms real video parameters into synthetic parameters through the image generation model. By changing the data generation parameters from real camera captures to AI-synthesized frames, the system preserves the essential visual and temporal characteristics needed for high-quality video generation while avoiding the data collection challenges of real-world footage. The parameter transformation enables quality maintenance without direct real data dependency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250356538A1Method and system for training video generation model
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 GENGENAI INC
  • US20250356538A1 patent drawing
  • US20250356538A1 patent drawing
  • US20250356538A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A video generation model training method includes obtaining first time-series label data and time-series images of a first domain style, training a first image generation model based on the first time-series label data and the time-series images of the first domain style, obtaining a plurality of label data sets and a plurality of images of a second domain style, training a second image generation model based on the plurality of label data sets and the plurality of images of the second domain style, training a first video generation model based on the first image generation model, the first time-series label data, and the time-series images of the first domain style, and generating a second video generation model associated with the second domain style based on the second image generation model and the first video generation model.