Video Object Scoring for Precise Visual Effect Application

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing video processing techniques are cumbersome and limited in applying visual effects, as they often blur the wrong objects in a video, failing to accurately apply special effects to the intended primary and secondary objects, thus not enhancing the user experience.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and apparatus that determine object scores based on predetermined factors to identify primary and secondary objects in a video, allowing for the application of visual effects to both, enhancing the video by focusing on relevant objects automatically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a user manually selects a region in a video to apply visual effects, then the visual effect can be applied to the intended object, but the operation becomes cumbersome and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of visual effect applicationVSAvoidtime required for manual region selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically identifies objects in the video and determines which objects should receive visual effects based on predetermined factors, eliminating the need for manual user selection. The apparatus performs self-service by autonomously analyzing video content and applying effects to appropriate primary and secondary objects without requiring user intervention for region selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of object identification from manual user specification to automatic computational determination. By introducing object scoring based on multiple factors (visibility, interaction, context), the system transforms the static manual selection process into a dynamic automated evaluation process that identifies primary and secondary objects for visual effect application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If visual effects are applied only to primary objects identified in the video, then the processing is simplified, but the enhancement is limited and may blur wrong objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of visual effect applicationVSAvoidaccuracy of object selection for visual effects
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments objects in the video into different categories: primary objects that are the main focus and secondary objects that are contextually relevant. This segmentation allows the application of visual effects to multiple object types simultaneously, ensuring that both the primary subject and important contextual elements (such as products in a demo) receive appropriate visual enhancement rather than being overlooked or incorrectly blurred.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different levels of visual effect processing to different objects based on their importance and contextual relevance. Primary objects receive standard visual effect application, while secondary objects are identified and processed based on their specific contextual significance. This local quality approach ensures that each object receives appropriate processing based on its role in the video, improving overall reliability of visual effect application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If automated object identification is implemented to reduce manual selection, then user effort is reduced, but the system may fail to correctly identify the intended objects for visual effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser effort in applying visual effectsVSAvoidaccuracy of automatic object identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system evaluates multiple parameters simultaneously (visibility factors, interaction factors, context factors) to compute comprehensive object scores. By considering several dimensions of object importance rather than relying on a single criterion, the automated identification achieves higher accuracy in selecting both primary and secondary objects for visual effects, matching or exceeding manual selection quality while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11948276B2Apparatus and method for enhancing videos
Publication Date: 2024.04.02 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US11948276B2 patent drawing
  • US11948276B2 patent drawing
  • US11948276B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method includes obtaining, from a storage, a video to be enhanced, based on a selection of a user; determining corresponding sets of object scores for a plurality of objects identified in the video, respectively, based on a set of predetermined factors; identifying a primary object and one or more secondary objects in the video, among the plurality of objects, based on the corresponding sets of object scores; and applying at least one visual effect to the primary object and at least one secondary object, from the one or more secondary objects, in at least a portion of the video, for obtaining an enhanced video with the at least one visual effect applied at least to the portion of the video.