Streaming Video Object Matching With Triplet Similarity Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing item-to-item recommendation systems face inefficiencies when there are insufficient data or when items lack common customers, as collaborative filtering struggles to compute similarity accurately, and content-based systems fail to identify relevant features, leading to ineffective recommendations.

Innovation Solution

Training a neural network using triplets of anchor, positive, and negative data points to recognize similar objects, allowing for robust feature extraction and recommendation based on both intrinsic and extrinsic properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If collaborative filtering is used to compute similarity between items, then recommendations can be generated based on user behavior patterns, but the system becomes ineffective when items have no common customers or insufficient data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation effectivenessVSAvoiddata availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism that combines collaborative filtering and content-based filtering. The system uses item characteristics (content-based) as an intermediary to bridge the gap when user interaction data is insufficient. This allows the system to generate recommendations even when items have no common customers by falling back to content similarity analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the parameters used for similarity computation based on data availability. When user behavior data is sufficient, it uses collaborative filtering parameters; when data is insufficient, it switches to content-based filtering parameters. This adaptive parameter change allows the system to maintain recommendation effectiveness across varying data conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If content-based filtering is used to extract features from item characteristics, then similarity can be computed based on shared characteristics, but the system fails when it cannot identify useful features in items

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature identification accuracyVSAvoidfeature extraction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the feature extraction process into multiple components. It separates item characteristics into distinct feature types (visual, textual, categorical) and applies specialized extraction methods to each. This segmentation allows the system to handle different item types effectively and identify useful features without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a universal feature extraction framework that can handle multiple types of item characteristics through a single integrated approach. The content-based filtering mechanism is designed to be multi-functional, adapting to different item types and characteristic formats while maintaining consistent feature identification accuracy across diverse datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If simple Euclidean pixel-wise distance metric is used for content-based filtering, then computation is simple, but the system assigns low similarity scores between images with different backgrounds even when item content is identical

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational simplicityVSAvoidsimilarity score accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and separates the background component from the item content in image processing. By taking out the background information, the system can compute similarity based solely on the item content itself, eliminating the confounding effect of different backgrounds. This extraction allows the system to maintain computational simplicity while significantly improving similarity score accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality analysis by differentiating between different regions of the image. It identifies which pixels correspond to item content versus background and applies appropriate weighting accordingly. This local differentiation ensures that similar item content receives high similarity scores regardless of background variations, while maintaining efficient computation through localized processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12488219B2Methods and apparatus for detecting, filtering, and identifying objects in streaming video
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 PAINTED DOG INC
  • US12488219B2 patent drawing
  • US12488219B2 patent drawing
  • US12488219B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Training neural networks to recognize matching items requires large data sets and long training times. Conversely, training a neural network with triplets of similar objects instead of triplets of identical objects relaxes constraints on the size and content of the data set, making training easier. Moreover, the notion of “similarity” can be almost arbitrary, making it possible to train the neural network to associate objects that aren't visually similar. For instance, the neural network can be trained to associate a suit with a tie, which is not possible with training on identical objects. And because the neural network is trained to recognize similar items, it can also recognize unfamiliar items if they are similar enough to the training data. This is a technical improvement over other neural networks, which can only recognize identical items, and over collaborative filtering systems, which can only recognize items for which they have enough data.