Video Presentation System with Segment-Based Playback Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pre-recorded demonstration videos often mismatch with live presenter explanations, leading to issues like rushed or delayed explanations, inability to pause or skip sections, and mismatched presentation flow, necessitating the need for flexible adjustment of video presentation order during live presentations.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented process within a video presentation system that analyzes the video to generate segments, captures presenter intent, and provides forward-looking controls to allow ad-hoc adjustments, enabling seamless synchronization of video playback with presenter explanations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a pre-recorded video is used for presentation, then the video content is fixed and ready for demonstration, but the video timing cannot match the presenter's explanation pace

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo content consistencyVSAvoidpresentation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The video is divided into multiple segments corresponding to different features or topics. Each segment can be independently controlled, allowing the presenter to selectively play, pause, or skip segments based on the discussion flow and audience questions, thereby achieving both content consistency and presentation flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static, fixed video playback to a dynamic, controllable segment-based playback. The presenter can dynamically adjust which segments are played, in what order, and when to pause or replay, making the presentation adaptable while maintaining video content quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the presenter follows the pre-recorded video timing, then the video plays smoothly, but the presenter must hurry or cut explanations to match video speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepresentation efficiencyVSAvoidpresenter control freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the video into feature-based units, the presenter can control playback at the segment level rather than being constrained by the entire video timeline. This allows the presenter to spend as much time as needed on each feature without rushing, while still maintaining efficient progression through the presentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows the presenter to self-manage the playback timing and sequence of segments based on their expertise and the audience's needs. The presenter can automatically jump to relevant segments, replay them as needed, and control the pace without being bound by the original video timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If the presenter wants to pause to highlight a feature, then the explanation can be emphasized, but the pre-recorded video continues playing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepresentation controlVSAvoidvideo playback synchronization
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The video is segmented into discrete feature-based units with clear boundaries. When the presenter wants to pause to highlight a feature, they can pause at the segment boundary without disrupting the overall video structure. The system maintains synchronization by knowing exactly which segment is currently playing and can resume from the correct position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to the presenter about the current playback position and segment being displayed. This allows the presenter to make informed decisions about when to pause or jump to segments, ensuring that pauses and transitions align with the video content structure and maintain synchronization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Loss of time

If the presenter wants to skip unimportant segments, then time can be saved, but the video playback order becomes disrupted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepresentation timeVSAvoidvideo sequence integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The segmented video structure allows the presenter to selectively skip segments while maintaining the integrity of the overall presentation sequence. The system tracks which segments have been played and can automatically transition to the next relevant segment, preserving the logical flow even when segments are skipped.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The video segments are pre-organized and tagged with metadata about their content and relationships. This preliminary structuring allows the system to automatically determine the next appropriate segment to play when the presenter skips a segment, maintaining sequence integrity without requiring manual reordering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240323318A1Video presentation system
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20240323318A1 patent drawing
  • US20240323318A1 patent drawing
  • US20240323318A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer hardware system includes a video analyzer configured to assist in a presentation of at least a portion of a video to a plurality of participants by a presenter on a presenter client and a hardware processor configured to perform the following executable operations. The video is analyzed to generate a plurality of segments. Presenter data is captured during the presentation, and presenter intent is determined based upon the presenter data. Based upon the presenter intent, forward-looking controls are presented only to the presenter client. One of the plurality of segments is identified using at least one of the presenter intent and the forward-looking controls. The identified one segment is presented to the plurality of participants.