Video Rate Control Algorithm for Scene Change and Buffer Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The MPEG2 TM5 rate-control algorithm lacks consideration for scene changes, film and video modes, busy and easy scenes, and buffer constraints, leading to suboptimal video quality and bit allocation in digital video compression.

Innovation Solution

A rate control algorithm that accounts for scene changes, inverse telecine, visual masking, and video buffering verifier (VBV) compliance to dynamically adjust bit allocation and maintain constant video quality, applicable to both constant bit rate (CBR) and variable bit rate (VBR) applications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If TM5 rate control algorithm is used, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but video quality uniformity deteriorates due to lack of consideration for scene changes and video complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidvideo quality uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The rate control algorithm performs preliminary analysis of scene changes and video complexity characteristics before encoding each frame. By detecting scene changes and estimating video complexity in advance, the algorithm can pre-determine appropriate bit allocation and quantization parameters, ensuring uniform video quality across different scene types while maintaining implementation feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The algorithm dynamically adjusts rate control parameters based on real-time detection of scene changes and video complexity. Instead of using fixed rate control settings, the system adapts bit allocation, quantization step sizes, and buffer management strategies according to the actual content characteristics, thereby achieving uniform video quality across diverse video sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If constant bit rate encoding is used, then transmission stability is improved, but video quality consistency deteriorates due to inability to adapt to varying scene complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission stabilityVSAvoidvideo quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The algorithm changes key encoding parameters such as quantization step size, bit allocation per macroblock, and buffer refill rates based on detected scene complexity. By dynamically adjusting these parameters while maintaining a target constant bit rate, the system achieves both transmission stability and video quality consistency across scenes with varying complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The rate control algorithm applies different encoding quality levels to different regions or frames based on their complexity characteristics. High-complexity scenes receive optimized bit allocation and quantization settings to maintain quality, while low-complexity scenes use more aggressive compression, thereby achieving overall video quality consistency within constant bit rate constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If scene changes are not considered in rate control, then processing complexity is reduced, but bit allocation efficiency deteriorates leading to poor viewing experience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing complexityVSAvoidbit allocation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The algorithm performs preliminary detection of scene changes by comparing consecutive frames or fields before rate control decisions are made. This preliminary action allows the system to identify scene boundaries and transition points, enabling more efficient bit allocation that accounts for scene changes without requiring complex real-time analysis during the encoding process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The video sequence is segmented into different scene segments based on detected scene changes. Each segment is then processed with appropriate rate control parameters tailored to its characteristics. This segmentation approach improves bit allocation efficiency by treating different scene types differently, while keeping processing complexity manageable through localized analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If buffer constraints are not considered, then encoding flexibility is increased, but compliance with decoder buffer requirements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveencoding flexibilityVSAvoiddecoder buffer compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The rate control algorithm incorporates feedback from the virtual buffer model to continuously monitor and adjust encoding decisions. By comparing the virtual buffer state against VBV constraints, the system dynamically adjusts bit allocation and quantization parameters to ensure compliance with decoder buffer requirements while maintaining encoding flexibility for adapting to different content types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

A virtual buffer model serves as an intermediary between the encoder and the actual decoder buffer. This virtual buffer allows the encoder to simulate and control buffer behavior without direct access to the decoder, enabling compliance with VBV constraints while maintaining encoding flexibility. The virtual buffer translates complex buffer requirements into manageable rate control decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS7933328B2Rate control for digital video compression processing
Publication Date: 2011.04.26 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD
  • US7933328B2 patent drawing
  • US7933328B2 patent drawing
  • US7933328B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A video compression algorithm for converting a digital video stream having video content into a compressed video bitstream, includes rate control to control the size of the compressed video bitstream. The rate control takes into account two or more of (1) detected scene changes, (2) detected repeated fields resulting from inverse telecine processing, (3) characterized video content complexity, and (4) a determined level of a model of a bit buffer associated with a decoder adapted to decode the compressed video bitstream. In preferred embodiments, the rate control takes into account two or more of these four factors in an integrated manner to change the allocation of bits for encoding different portions of the video stream.