High-Resolution Video Processing With Adaptive Rate-Distortion Scaling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing video compression techniques struggle to achieve high compression rates while maintaining video quality, particularly with increasing video resolutions.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for pre-processing video content involves generating groups of video frames with varying resolutions and distortion scores, followed by selecting an optimal group based on rate-distortion comparison, and post-processing to reduce compression artifacts using convolutional neural networks (CNNs).

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If video compression rate is increased to reduce storage and bandwidth requirements, then storage and transmission efficiency is improved, but video quality deteriorates due to loss of detail and increased compression artifacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression rateVSAvoidvideo quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of video content characteristics (complexity, motion, texture) before compression to determine optimal compression parameters. This advance preparation allows the encoder to apply different compression strategies to different video regions and segments, preserving quality where needed while maximizing compression where possible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different compression techniques and quality levels to different regions of video frames based on local characteristics. Important regions (faces, text, motion-critical areas) receive higher quality treatment while less important regions are compressed more aggressively. This regional differentiation resolves the contradiction by maintaining overall quality while achieving high average compression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If video resolution is increased to improve picture quality, then visual fidelity is improved, but data size and storage requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo qualityVSAvoiddata size
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts video resolution and quality parameters based on content characteristics and playback conditions. Rather than using a fixed high resolution for all content, the resolution is adaptively modified - using higher resolutions for complex, detail-critical scenes and lower resolutions for simpler content, thereby maintaining quality while reducing overall data size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs multiple resolution versions and quality parameters for the same video content. The system selects and switches between different resolution parameters (e.g., 4K, 1080p, 720p) based on content complexity, device capabilities, and network conditions, allowing high quality where needed while minimizing data storage requirements through parameter variation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12526423B2Methods and apparatus for processing of high-resolution video content
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US12526423B2 patent drawing
  • US12526423B2 patent drawing
  • US12526423B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure refers to methods and apparatuses for processing of high-resolution video content. In an embodiment, a method includes generating a first group of video frames from the video content. The first group of video frames has a first resolution lower than a resolution of the video content and a first rate-distortion score. The method further includes generating a second group of video frames from the video content. The second group of video frames has a second resolution lower than the resolution of the video content and a second rate-distortion score. The method further includes selecting an optimal group of video frames from the first and second groups of video frames based on a comparison between the first and second rate-distortion scores. The optimal group of video frames has a rate-distortion score lower than the first and the second rate-distortion scores.