Video Redaction via Data Extraction and Metadata Linking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for redacting sensitive information in video files, such as those from social media and security cameras, are inadequate as they do not ensure complete security against public access and decoding, with conventional blurring methods being easily reversible and original files remaining accessible.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that create a duplicate video file, allowing users to define and redact specific data, saving the original data securely and embedding metadata for authorized retrieval, ensuring only redacted data is publicly accessible while maintaining the original data's privacy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional blurring methods are used to redact sensitive information, then the redaction process is simple and fast, but the security is insufficient as the original data can be decoded or retrieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity of redacted informationVSAvoidcomplexity of redaction system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the sensitive original data from the video file and stores it separately in a secure database, while the redacted video file contains only the blurred version. This separation ensures that even if someone obtains the redacted video, they cannot retrieve the original sensitive information without proper authorization and access to the separate database.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the video data into two distinct parts: the redacted video file accessible to the public and the original sensitive data stored separately in a secured database. This segmentation prevents unauthorized access to the complete information while maintaining public access to the redacted version.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If original video files are saved in an accessible database for public search, then public users can easily retrieve videos, but sensitive information in those videos is exposed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility of video searchVSAvoidexposure of sensitive information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a redacted video file as an intermediary between the original video and the public. The redacted video file serves as a mediator that allows public access to video content while filtering out sensitive information through blurring, thus protecting the original sensitive data from direct exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a copy of the original video file and applies redaction to this copy, while the original file remains stored in a secured database. This copying approach allows the public to access the redacted version without compromising the security of the original sensitive information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of manufacture

If manual selection and blocking of irrelevant faces is performed, then the redaction process is simple, but total security is not guaranteed as decoding is possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of redaction processVSAvoidsecurity guarantee of blocked information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of merely blocking sensitive information with overlays, the patent extracts the actual sensitive data (faces, speeches, texts) from the video and stores it separately in a secured database. This extraction ensures that the blocked information cannot be decoded from the redacted video alone, as the original data is separated and protected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares for potential security breaches by beforehand separating and securing the original sensitive data in a protected database. This prior cushioning measure ensures that even if the redacted video is compromised, the original sensitive information remains protected due to the pre-established separation and security measures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS20230222235A1Method and system for redacting and retrieving data in a video
Publication Date: 2023.07.13 KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC
  • US20230222235A1 patent drawing
  • US20230222235A1 patent drawing
  • US20230222235A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for redacting private or sensitive information in a video file before publishing the video file to the public are disclosed. The system and method do not redact an original video file but a duplicated video file, and only redacted duplicated video file will be displayed to a public user. A system and method for retrieving original data corresponding to the redacted data are also disclosed. Metadata is embedded in redacted data of the redacted duplicated video file, which when activated, will direct to a location where the original data is stored.