In-Cabin Video Rights Management via Role-Based Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In-cabin video cameras typically operate under the sole control of the vehicle driver, which is limiting and intrusive to passengers, as it does not allow for effective management of digital rights for multiple users or entities involved in the recording.

Innovation Solution

A roles and rights management system that includes a unit configured to define user capabilities for accessing and controlling video recordings, using processing circuitry and communication interfaces to manage permissions for viewing, storing, deleting, segmenting, and encrypting video content, and implementing a voting mechanism for participants to manage video segments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the vehicle driver has sole control over video recordings, then the control and management of video content is simplified, but the passenger's privacy rights and control over their recorded segments are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo controlVSAvoidpassenger privacy intrusion
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments video control rights by user role and geographic location. Different users (driver, passenger, administrator) have different levels of control over specific video segments. The system divides video content into segments based on location and time, allowing granular control where passengers can manage segments containing themselves while the driver maintains control over other portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements location-based rights management where control capabilities vary by geographic location. The system determines a user's location and assigns control rights accordingly - for example, a passenger may have full control over video segments recorded at locations they specify as private, while the driver retains control at other locations. This creates localized quality differences in control authority.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a roles and rights management system is implemented to allow passenger control, then privacy rights and user control are improved, but the system complexity and difficulty of video management increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidrights management system
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal rights management framework that handles multiple user roles (driver, passenger, administrator), multiple video operations (view, delete, share, download), and multiple decision-making modes (individual voting, consensus, administrator override) within a single system. This multi-functional approach consolidates complexity into one unified system rather than requiring separate mechanisms for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary rights management system that mediates between the driver's control and passenger's privacy concerns. This intermediary layer automatically handles the complex logic of determining who has control over which video segments based on location, user role, and predefined rules, shielding users from the underlying complexity while maintaining privacy protections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If video segments are managed through voting mechanisms, then user participation and privacy control are enhanced, but the time required to make decisions about video content increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser privacy controlVSAvoidvideo decision time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial voting where not all users must participate in every decision. The system allows video segments to be managed through voting mechanisms when needed, but permits administrators or predefined rules to make decisions unilaterally in routine cases. This partial application of voting reduces time loss while maintaining privacy control when actually necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes predefined voting rules, thresholds, and decision-making protocols in advance. The system pre-configures which scenarios require voting, what the voting thresholds are, and how ties are resolved. This preliminary setup eliminates the need for ad-hoc decision-making discussions, allowing the voting mechanism to execute efficiently when triggered without time-consuming negotiations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12137261B2Video rights management for an in-cabin monitoring system
Publication Date: 2024.11.05 THE ADT SECURITY CORPORATION
  • US12137261B2 patent drawing
  • US12137261B2 patent drawing
  • US12137261B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Roles and rights management systems are provided. The systems are configured for receiving an in-vehicle video recording of a rideshare vehicle, where the in-vehicle video recording includes a video recording segment associated with a plurality of rideshare users, determining that the plurality of rideshare users are permitted to vote on an action associated with the video recording segment, receiving, from at least one of the plurality of rideshare users, at least one vote associated with the video recording segment, and initiating the action in response to the at least one vote.