Video Sieving for Guided Vehicle Movement Authority

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current rail systems face challenges in safely and efficiently issuing movement authorities to guided vehicles, particularly when relying on driver input or manual confirmation, which can lead to human errors and infrastructure failures, especially for high-speed trains and situations where unfitted vehicles may occupy tracks without reporting their position.

Innovation Solution

A video sieving system that uses a camera system and processing unit to acquire and analyze images of the track section ahead, identifying guided vehicles through unique identification keys and determining track continuity, thereby automatically triggering or preventing movement authorities without driver input, ensuring the track is clear before issuing permissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If driver confirmation is required for Track Ahead Free process, then safety is improved by human verification, but productivity deteriorates due to manual intervention delays and human error potential

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical human verification process with an automated video-based detection system. The camera system captures images of the track ahead, and image processing algorithms automatically analyze whether the track is clear, substituting the driver's manual confirmation process with an automated visual inspection system that operates continuously without human intervention delays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing the guided vehicle to automatically receive movement authorities based on automated track clearance verification. The vehicle's control system processes video images and determination results autonomously to trigger movement authorities without requiring external human confirmation, making the safety verification process self-executing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If PCA process uses small separation distance, then productivity is improved by enabling faster movement authority issuance, but reliability deteriorates because high-speed trains must decrease speed significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement authority issuance speedVSAvoidtrain operation safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary track clearance verification using video imaging before issuing movement authorities. By capturing and analyzing images of the track ahead in advance, the system confirms clearance conditions are met before the train needs to slow down, allowing movement authorities to be issued proactively rather than reactively when the train is already approaching the boundary

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The video image analysis system acts as an intermediary between the train's position and the movement authority issuance decision. Rather than relying solely on distance calculations that force speed reductions, the intermediary video verification system provides direct visual confirmation of track clearance, enabling more accurate and timely movement authority triggering that maintains safety without requiring excessive speed adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If RBC assumes track section is occupied when issuing first movement authority, then reliability is improved by preventing collisions with unfitted vehicles, but productivity deteriorates due to conservative safety margins requiring larger separation distances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision preventionVSAvoidtrack utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the conservative radio-based detection system with a video-based visual verification system. Instead of assuming track occupation based on radio silence or track circuit status, the camera system directly observes and captures images of the track ahead, providing positive visual confirmation of clearance conditions. This substitution allows the system to issue movement authorities with greater confidence and smaller safety margins

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback through automated image capture and analysis of the track ahead. The video verification provides real-time feedback on actual track conditions rather than relying on assumptions, allowing the RBC to adjust movement authority issuance dynamically based on observed clearance conditions. This feedback mechanism enables more efficient track utilization while maintaining collision prevention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3339133B1System and method for triggering a sending of a movement authority for a guided vehicle
Publication Date: 2019.07.10 SIEMENS RAIL AUTOMATION
  • EP3339133B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

The present invention concerns a method and a system for triggering a sending of a movement authority to a guided vehicle (A) moving on a track (1) of a railway network from a first track section (10) towards a second track section (11) limited by a boundary (15), said method comprising: - acquiring an image of the first track section (10) including the boundary (15) by means of a camera system (31) of a trackside device; - analyzing by means of a processing unit (32) the image acquired by the camera system (31) in order to detect a presence of the guided vehicle (A) in the acquired image of the first track section (10); - if the presence of the guided vehicle (A) is detected by the processing unit (32), then identifying the guided vehicle (A) by means of said processing unit (32); - if the detected guided vehicle (A) has been identified by the processing unit (32), then determining if a portion of track (1) separating a front end of the detected guided vehicle (A) from the boundary (15) is free of any obstacle; - if the detected guided vehicle has been identified and if the portion of track (1) has been determined to be free of any obstacle by the processing unit (32), then triggering a sending of a movement authority to the detected and identified guided vehicle (A) by means of said processing unit (32).