Video Encoding Temporal Layers for Adaptive Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing video encoding technologies face challenges in dynamically adjusting video quality and bitrate to accommodate variations in video complexity, network capabilities, and device resources during real-time video conferencing or telephony, leading to suboptimal video fidelity and resource utilization.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the creation of a data structure that represents video content as temporal layers with different quality levels, where frames are assigned based on sampling periods and relationships, allowing for dynamic encoding and decoding to match network throughput and device capabilities, enabling adaptive video quality and efficient resource allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If video encoding uses fixed quality levels and bitrates, then encoding simplicity is maintained, but video quality cannot adapt to varying network conditions and device capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo quality adaptabilityVSAvoidencoding structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The video encoding system segments the video stream into multiple temporal layers, each representing different quality levels and frame rates. This segmentation allows the encoder to provide multiple versions of the same video content with varying complexity, enabling adaptation to different network conditions and device capabilities without requiring a completely different encoding approach for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The encoding system dynamically selects which temporal layers to transmit and decode based on real-time network conditions and device capabilities. The decoder can adaptively adjust the number of temporal layers processed, allowing the system to transition between high-quality and low-quality modes seamlessly, making the video communication resilient to varying bandwidth availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If all video frames are encoded and transmitted at high quality, then video fidelity is maximized, but network bandwidth and computational resources are wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo fidelityVSAvoidnetwork bandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Different temporal layers are assigned different quality levels and frame rates based on their importance and the characteristics of the video content. Critical temporal layers maintain higher fidelity while less critical layers use lower bitrates and frame rates, allowing the system to optimize the distribution of quality across different parts of the video stream according to local requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If frame rates are reduced to save bandwidth, then network efficiency improves, but video quality and temporal resolution deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork efficiencyVSAvoidvideo quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The video stream is divided into multiple temporal layers with different frame rates. The base temporal layer provides a lower frame rate for basic video communication, while additional temporal layers provide higher frame rates for improved quality. This segmentation allows the system to maintain network efficiency by transmitting only the necessary frame rate while preserving the option to enhance quality when network conditions permit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple quality levels are supported, then adaptability to different devices improves, but decoding complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice compatibilityVSAvoiddecoding processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The decoder dynamically adjusts the number of temporal layers it processes based on its computational capabilities and the current network conditions. Devices with limited processing power can decode only the base temporal layer for acceptable video quality, while more powerful devices can decode additional layers for enhanced quality, allowing the system to adapt to a wide range of device capabilities without requiring complex decoding algorithms to always run at maximum complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11677934B2Encoding and decoding video content
Publication Date: 2023.06.13 APPLE INC
  • US11677934B2 patent drawing
  • US11677934B2 patent drawing
  • US11677934B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an example method, a system receives a plurality of frames of a video, and generates a data structure representing the video and representing a plurality of temporal layers. Generating the data structure includes: (i) determining a plurality of quality levels for presenting the video, where each of the quality levels corresponds to a different respective sampling period for sampling the frames of the video, (ii) assigning, based on the sampling periods, each of the frames to a respective one of the temporal layers of the data structure, and (iii) indicating, in the data structure, one or more relationships between (a) at least one the frames assigned to at least one of the temporal layers of the data structure, and (b) at least another one of the frames assigned to at least another one of the temporal layers of the data structure. Further, the system outputs the data structure.