Deep Learning Viewpoint Estimation for Autonomous Driving

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous driving systems face challenges in accurately determining the direction an object is facing in real-time, leading to potential collisions due to the need for additional data and recalculation, which can delay reaction times and consume excessive computing resources.

Innovation Solution

A viewpoint system utilizing a deep learning model that analyzes image data from cameras to determine object viewpoints, employing a classification technique with a trained model that processes images to provide accurate direction estimates, conserving resources by only re-evaluating when confidence levels fall below a threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If additional data collection and recalculation are performed to improve object direction determination accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject direction determination accuracyVSAvoidreaction time delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by collecting additional data and performing recalculation in advance when confidence levels indicate potential inaccuracies, rather than waiting for collision risks to materialize. This allows the autonomous driving system to proactively improve measurement precision without causing time loss during critical decision-making moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its data collection and recalculation processes based on real-time confidence level assessments. When confidence is high, the system maintains current determinations to save time. When confidence is low, the system activates additional data collection and recalculation to improve accuracy, creating a dynamic balance between precision and time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If additional data collection and recalculation are performed to improve object direction determination accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject direction determination accuracyVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by selectively collecting only the specific additional data needed to resolve confidence level issues, rather than performing comprehensive recalculations on all available data. This approach improves measurement precision for critical parameters while maintaining overall processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically assessing confidence levels and triggering additional data collection and recalculation only when necessary. This self-regulating mechanism ensures measurement precision is improved at the minimum necessary processing cost, maintaining productivity while enhancing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If continuous monitoring and re-evaluation are performed to ensure accurate object direction determination, then reliability is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject direction determination reliabilityVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic action by continuously monitoring confidence levels and performing re-evaluation only at intervals when confidence thresholds are breached, rather than maintaining constant intensive processing. This periodic reassessment maintains reliability by catching accuracy issues when they arise while significantly reducing overall energy consumption compared to continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms where confidence level assessments trigger conditional re-evaluation processes. This feedback-driven approach ensures reliability by automatically initiating additional verification when accuracy concerns arise, while avoiding unnecessary energy consumption during high-confidence periods when the system operates normally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11922651B2Systems and methods for utilizing a deep learning model to determine vehicle viewpoint estimations
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 VERIZON CONNECT DEVELOPMENT LTD
  • US11922651B2 patent drawing
  • US11922651B2 patent drawing
  • US11922651B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device may receive a first image. The device may process the first image to identify an object in the first image and a location of the object within the first image. The device may extract a second image from the first image based on the location of the object within the first image. The device may process the second image to determine at least one of a coarse-grained viewpoint estimate or a fine-grained viewpoint estimate associated with the object. The device may determine an object viewpoint associated with the second vehicle based on the at least one of the coarse-grained viewpoint estimate or the fine-grained viewpoint estimate. The device may perform one or more actions based on the object viewpoint.