3D Viewpoint and Targeting Control via Screen Zone Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gaming platforms with single pointing devices, such as optical and accelerometer sensors, struggle to realistically replicate the ability to control both 3D viewpoint panning and object targeting simultaneously, as users accustomed to dual joystick controls face challenges in achieving seamless head movement and weapon aiming.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a system that divides the screen into specific zones, allowing the cursor to control virtual camera panning when outside a 'dead zone' while maintaining object targeting within it, with adjustable panning rates based on cursor position and duration, enabling the same pointing control to manage both 3D viewpoint and targeting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single pointing device is used to control both 3D viewpoint panning and object targeting, then device complexity is reduced, but control precision and user familiarity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol device complexityVSAvoidcontrol precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The display screen is divided into multiple zones (first zone, second zone, third zone) that correspond to different control functions. The first zone controls object targeting, the second zone controls 3D viewpoint panning, and the third zone provides transition space. This spatial segmentation allows a single pointing device to control multiple functions with distinct precision characteristics for each zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the display screen are assigned different control qualities and sensitivities. The first zone (peripheral regions) provides precise targeting control, while the second zone (central region) enables smooth viewpoint panning. This local differentiation of control characteristics resolves the contradiction by optimizing precision where needed while maintaining simplicity overall.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If dual joystick controls are used for 3D viewpoint and object targeting, then control precision and user familiarity are maintained, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidcontrol device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single pointing device is designed to perform multiple functions by detecting different input types (first input for targeting, second input for viewpoint control) and routing them to appropriate control modes. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate joysticks while maintaining control precision through context-aware processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically switches between different operational modes based on which zone the pointer is in and what type of input is detected. The system adapts its control characteristics in real-time, providing targeting precision when in the first zone and viewpoint panning when in the second zone, thereby maintaining precision without requiring multiple static control devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If the cursor controls 3D viewpoint panning across the entire screen, then viewpoint control is simplified, but object targeting precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviewpoint control easeVSAvoidtargeting precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The display is segmented into zones with different control behaviors. The first zone (peripheral areas) is dedicated to precise object targeting where cursor movement does not trigger viewpoint panning. The second zone (central area) enables viewpoint panning when the cursor is positioned there. This segmentation allows both functions to operate with optimal precision in their respective zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The third zone acts as a transition or intermediary region between the targeting zone and the viewpoint control zone. This intermediary space allows smooth transitions between control modes without abrupt switching, maintaining both ease of viewpoint control and targeting precision by providing a buffer zone for mode transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9339724B2Method and apparatus for using a common pointing input to control 3D viewpoint and object targeting
Publication Date: 2016.05.17 NINTENDO CO LTD
  • US9339724B2 patent drawing
  • US9339724B2 patent drawing
  • US9339724B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer graphics display system such as a video game system provides virtual camera 3-D viewpoint panning control based on a pointer. When the pointer is displayed within a virtual camera panning control region, the system automatically pans the virtual camera toward the pointer. When the pointer is displayed within a different region, panning is deactivated and the user can freely move the cursor (e.g., to control the direction a weapon is pointed) without panning the virtual camera viewpoint. Flexible viewpoint control and other animated features are provided based on a pointing device such as a handheld video game optical pointing control. Useful applications include but are not limited to first person shooter type video games.