Vine Branch Extraction Machine Downward Pulling Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machines for removing cut vine branches in Guyot pruning systems face challenges such as high stress on tying wires, risk of wire breakage, and increased accident risk due to weight offset, as well as inefficiency and high costs, particularly when trying to extract branches upwards.

Innovation Solution

A vine branch pulling machine that extracts cut branches downwards using a flexible feeding disk and rollers with chevron-shaped ribs to grip and remove branches without damaging the fruit-bearing branches, reducing the need for significant force and minimizing stress on the tying wires, and is designed to work with the existing Guyot pruning system without requiring extensive modifications to the vineyard infrastructure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If vine branches are pulled upwards from the tying wires, then extraction can be performed, but high stress is applied to the tying wires causing breakage and machine standstill

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction capabilityVSAvoidtying wire strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the extraction direction from upward pulling to downward pulling. The extraction device is positioned above the tying wires and pulls branches downward, reversing the conventional approach. This inversion eliminates the V-shape conflict where upward pulling directs wires into branch ramifications, and prevents high stress on tying wires that causes breakage and machine standstill.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Productivity

If extraction forces are increased to remove branches from tying wires, then branches can be extracted, but tying wires and posts are damaged leading to machine standstill

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction efficiencyVSAvoidinfrastructure integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By inverting the extraction direction to pull downward, the patent achieves effective branch removal without requiring excessive forces that would damage tying wires and posts. The downward pulling direction naturally separates branches from the tying system without creating the high-stress conditions that lead to infrastructure damage and machine standstill.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Ease of operation

If the machine is positioned above the row for upward extraction, then branches can be pulled, but weight offset increases accident risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction functionVSAvoidaccident risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts both the extraction direction and machine positioning. Instead of positioning the machine above the row for upward extraction, the machine is positioned below the row to perform downward extraction. This inversion eliminates the high weight offset that creates accident risks while maintaining effective branch extraction capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Ease of manufacture

If manual extraction is used to remove individual branches, then precise control is achieved, but time consumption and labor costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction precisionVSAvoidextraction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated extraction that performs the removal function without continuous manual intervention. The extraction device automatically engages with branches, pulls them downward, and removes them from the tying system, eliminating the need for manual extraction of each individual branch while maintaining control over the extraction process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical extraction process with an automated mechanical extraction device. The device uses controlled mechanical forces to pull branches downward, substituting human labor and time-consuming manual operations with an automated system that achieves the same extraction function more efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The machine effectively reduces the effort required for vine branch removal, minimizes damage to the vineyard infrastructure, preserves fruit-bearing branches, and lowers operational costs and energy consumption, while ensuring safe and efficient operation.

Implementation Method 1

A vine branch pulling machine (101) that extracts cut branches downwards using a flexible feeding disk (119) and rollers with chevron-shaped ribs to grip and remove branches

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

rollers with chevron-shaped ribs to grip and remove branches

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3595434B1Machine for and method of extracting vine branches
Publication Date: 2021.07.07 ANDELFINGER DIDIER
  • EP3595434B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3595434B1 patent drawingFigure 2~8
  • EP3595434B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A machine (101) for pulling off plant branches (64, 65; 233), in particular vine branches, of tying wires (58-62) to which they cling by tendrils comprising a combination of means capable to extract the branches (64, 65; 233) downwards. Preferably, the combination of means comprises a (resiliently pivoted) pressing member (119) and a pulling member (139) facing the pressing member (119). In operation, the pulling member (139) is moving so that its surface oriented towards the pressing member (119) moves downwards. Cut-off branches (64, 65; 233) are pressed on this surface by the pressing member (119) by a force sufficient that the branches (64, 65; 233) are dragged downwardly along and are forcibly detached from the tying wires (58-62) thereby. The downward removal corresponds to the about V-shaped ramifications of the plant, so that it is effected more easily and without obstruction by the ramifications which tend to get caught by the tying wires (58-62) when removal occurs upwards. Furthermore, a branch not cut-off (66; 235) and tied to the trellis wire (58-62) withstands the pressing member provided a suitable adjusted resilient pressing force is selected, supported by the pressing member consisting of a resilient material like an elastomer. In consequence, such a branch (66, 235) will not suffer any contact, or at least a minimal contact only, with the pulling device.