Violation Detection in Electronic Communications

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for monitoring communications for violations in financial and legal contexts are inefficient, relying on labor-intensive rules-based approaches that struggle with high volumes of disparate data, leading to increased costs and difficulties in identifying potential violations effectively.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing trainable models to detect indicators of potential violation conditions in electronic communications, which involves receiving data, marking potential violations, and improving the model based on user decisions, incorporating supervised and unsupervised machine learning to refine pattern recognition and alerting thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If rules-based trade and transactional monitoring is used to monitor employee and customer activity, then compliance monitoring can be performed, but the cost of compliance increases due to labor-intensive processes needed to filter through volumes of erroneous information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance monitoring capabilityVSAvoidcost efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual labor-intensive rules-based monitoring with an automated machine learning system. The system uses trained models to automatically analyze electronic communications, detect violation indicators, and generate alerts, eliminating the need for human operators to manually filter through volumes of erroneous information while maintaining reliable compliance monitoring capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-improving monitoring by automatically learning from user feedback. When users review and correct detected violations, the system uses this feedback to retrain its models, enabling the monitoring system to improve its own accuracy and reduce erroneous alerts over time without requiring continuous human intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If extensive rules-based monitoring is implemented to identify violations, then detection capability is provided, but labor-intensive processes are required to filter through high volumes of erroneous information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviolation detection capabilityVSAvoidtime required to filter erroneous information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual filtering of erroneous information with automated machine learning models that can process large volumes of electronic communications rapidly. The trained models automatically distinguish between legitimate communications and potential violations, eliminating the time-consuming manual filtering process while maintaining high detection reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where users review detected violations and provide corrections. This feedback is used to continuously retrain the machine learning models, improving their ability to accurately identify violations and reducing the volume of erroneous alerts that require manual review over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If machine learning models are trained using user feedback to improve detection accuracy, then precision of detecting violation conditions is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of detecting violation conditionsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from user reviews of detected violations to automatically retrain the machine learning models. This feedback loop enables the system to continuously improve its detection precision by learning from real-world examples, with the added benefit that the same feedback mechanism automatically manages system complexity by optimizing model performance without requiring manual configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Extent of automation

If a trainable model is used to detect indicators of potential violation conditions, then automation of monitoring is improved, but the initial setup and training requirements increase complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of monitoringVSAvoidmodel training requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-training by automatically learning from user feedback on detected violations. Rather than requiring complex manual setup and training configurations, the system autonomously improves its detection capabilities over time through feedback-driven model retraining, reducing the initial setup complexity while maintaining high automation levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11019107B1Systems and methods for identifying violation conditions from electronic communications
Publication Date: 2021.05.25 DIGITAL REASONING SYSTEMS INC
  • US11019107B1 patent drawing
  • US11019107B1 patent drawing
  • US11019107B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Some aspects of the present disclosure relate to systems and methods for identifying potential violation conditions from electronic communications. In one embodiment, a method includes receiving data associated with an electronic communication and detecting, from the received data, and using a trainable model, an indicator of a potential violation condition, where the violation condition is associated with an activity that is a violation of a predetermined standard. The method also includes, responsive to detecting the indicator of the potential violation condition, marking the electronic communication as being associated with a potential violation condition, and presenting the potential violation condition to a user for review. The method also includes receiving a decision from the user, based on the review, on whether the electronic communication is associated with a violation condition, and based on the decision, improving the model for detecting potential violation conditions in other electronic communications.