Virtual Agent Intent Prediction and Confidence-Based Deflection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing customer support systems face inefficiencies due to automated conversational agents (VAs) being unable to accurately interpret customer queries, leading to increased time spent by human agents in handling conversations and a lack of timely assistance for customers.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that predict customer intents and compute confidence scores for VA responses, deflecting conversations to human agents when confidence is low and back to VAs when confidence is high, ensuring timely and effective assistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If the VA is configured to request the customer to ask the query in a different form when the customer query is not clear, then the VA can maintain its automated operation, but the query disambiguation takes longer and the customer does not get the best experience in a timely manner

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveVA automated operationVSAvoidquery disambiguation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

A human agent serves as an intermediary to review ambiguous customer queries that the VA cannot confidently interpret. The human agent provides disambiguation guidance to the VA, enabling the VA to learn from these interactions and improve its interpretation capabilities over time, reducing the need for repeated disambiguation requests.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where human agents review VA performance on ambiguous queries and provide corrections. This feedback loop allows the VA to learn from human expertise, improving its intent recognition accuracy and reducing future disambiguation needs while maintaining automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the VA deflects the conversation to a human agent when it cannot interpret the customer query correctly, then the customer receives accurate assistance, but a large number of conversations are handed over to human agents increasing their time spent substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer assistance accuracyVSAvoidhuman agent conversation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical handoff mechanism with an intelligent learning system. Instead of directly deflecting ambiguous queries to human agents, the system uses machine learning models to predict customer intent and only deflects when confidence thresholds are not met. This substitution reduces unnecessary human agent involvement while maintaining accurate customer assistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the confidence threshold parameter for query interpretation. By optimizing this parameter, the system balances between maintaining high customer assistance accuracy and reducing the volume of conversations requiring human agent intervention, thereby reducing human agent time spent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the VA uses NLP algorithms and special grammar to interpret customer's natural language inputs, then the VA can respond to various queries, but the VA is limited in its ability to provide assistance due to the sheer variety of requests

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveVA response capabilityVSAvoidVA assistance effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary learning by having human agents review and correct VA interpretations of ambiguous queries before the VA encounters similar queries in production. This preliminary action allows the VA to pre-load knowledge from human expertise, improving its ability to handle diverse requests reliably without sacrificing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10798245B2Method and apparatus for facilitating agent conversations with customers of an enterprise
Publication Date: 2020.10.06 24 7 AI INC
  • US10798245B2 patent drawing
  • US10798245B2 patent drawing
  • US10798245B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method and apparatus for facilitating agent interactions with customers of an enterprise, one or more intents corresponding to an input provided by a customer during a conversation with a Virtual Agent (VA) are predicted. A confidence score corresponding to each intent is computed that is indicative of an ability of the VA to provide an effective response to the input. The confidence score corresponding to each intent is compared with a predefined threshold score. If the confidence score is less than the predefined threshold score, the conversation is deflected from the VA to a human agent to respond to the input of the customer. The conversation is deflected from the human agent to the VA for a subsequent input if a respective confidence score of at least one intent predicted for the subsequent input is greater than or equal to the predefined threshold score.