Virtual Asset Validation via Dual-Channel Authentication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In cloud computing environments, there is a significant risk of malicious virtual assets spoofing legitimate ones, leading to unauthorized access to sensitive data, as existing verification methods are inadequate in distinguishing between genuine and fake virtual assets.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that generates and verifies virtual asset creation data, including primary and secondary authentication data, to ensure that virtual assets are validated before receiving sensitive information, using a combination of 'inside' and 'outside' data for authentication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If cloud computing environments allow virtual assets to access sensitive data, then productivity and service capability are improved, but security risk increases due to spoofing attacks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice capabilityVSAvoidsecurity risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary authentication by generating and verifying digital signatures before the virtual asset receives any sensitive data. The owner signs the virtual asset creation data in advance, and this signature is verified before data transfer, preventing spoofing attacks before they can compromise security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary validation process that mediates between the virtual asset owner and the virtual asset. The owner's digital signature acts as an intermediary credential that proves authenticity, allowing the system to trust the virtual asset without directly exposing sensitive data until verification is complete.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If traditional verification methods are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but measurement precision of virtual asset authenticity is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidauthentication accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces traditional mechanical verification methods (manual checks, basic authentication) with cryptographic digital signature verification. This substitution provides mathematically provable authentication accuracy while maintaining ease of operation through automated verification processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the authentication parameter from simple identity claims to cryptographic proof of ownership. By requiring digital signatures that can only be generated by the private key holder, the system transforms the authentication parameter into something that provides precise verification of authenticity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If comprehensive authentication data is collected and verified, then reliability of virtual asset validation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential authentication element (the owner's digital signature) from the virtual asset creation data. Rather than verifying all possible attributes of a virtual asset, the system focuses on the critical proof of ownership, simplifying the validation process while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The digital signature mechanism serves multiple functions simultaneously: it authenticates the owner's identity, verifies the virtual asset creation data integrity, and provides non-repudiation. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate verification mechanisms, lowering overall system complexity while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3063690B1Method and system for validating a virtual asset
Publication Date: 2020.12.02 INTUIT INC
  • EP3063690B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3063690B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3063690B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Virtual asset creation data used to create a virtual asset is generated through a virtual asset creation system that includes primary virtual asset data. Secondary authentication data is also generated. When the virtual asset is launched, the secondary authentication data is passed to the virtual asset from the virtual asset creation system. The primary virtual asset data and secondary authentication data from the virtual asset creation system and the virtual asset, and/or one or more other sources associated with the virtual asset, are then sent to a virtual asset validation system through different communication channels. If the primary virtual asset data and secondary authentication data from the two sources match, or have a defined threshold level of similarity, the status of the virtual asset is transformed to the status of validated virtual asset eligible to receive sensitive data.