Virtual Asset Wallet Address Database for Fraud Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current virtual asset exchanges lack effective measures to prevent the misuse of virtual asset wallets for illegal transactions and fraudulent activities, as the creation of these wallets is easy and security procedures are lax.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for creating a virtual asset wallet address database based on online harmful sites, which involves generating a whitelist of normal trading e-wallet addresses and a blacklist of high-risk addresses through data collection, analysis, and online resource crawling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If virtual asset wallet creation procedures are simplified and security authentication is made lax, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates as anyone can create wallets for fraudulent purposes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewallet creation easeVSAvoidtransaction security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively crawling online harmful sites, dark web, and Telegram channels to collect wallet addresses associated with fraudulent activities before these wallets are used for illegal transactions. This advance preparation enables the exchange to pre-identify and block high-risk wallets, resolving the contradiction by maintaining security without requiring complex authentication procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs automated self-service mechanisms where the crawling server autonomously searches for harmful wallet addresses across multiple online platforms, and the analysis server automatically compares these against transaction data. This eliminates the need for manual security review processes, maintaining ease of operation while ensuring reliable fraud detection through continuous automated monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If comprehensive security measures are implemented to prevent fraudulent wallet creation, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud prevention capabilityVSAvoidsecurity system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the security verification function from the traditional account creation process. Instead of implementing complex authentication procedures during wallet creation, the system separates security checks into a distinct module that proactively identifies fraudulent wallets through online crawling and analysis, then blocks them independently. This extraction resolves the contradiction by maintaining high reliability without adding complexity to the core wallet creation functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary analysis server that acts as a mediator between transaction processing and fraud detection. This intermediary component receives wallet address information, cross-references it with data from harmful sites, and determines whether to allow transactions. This modular intermediary approach enables comprehensive security measures while keeping the overall system architecture simple and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If manual identification of fraudulent wallets is performed, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to time-consuming analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidtransaction processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical analysis of wallet addresses with automated computational processes. The crawling server automatically scrapes harmful sites, and the analysis server uses algorithms to compare wallet addresses against collected data from dark web and Telegram channels. This substitution of mechanical manual review with automated computing maintains high detection precision while dramatically improving productivity by processing vast numbers of wallets simultaneously without time constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous automated crawling and analysis operations that run uninterrupted to maintain an up-to-date database of fraudulent wallet addresses. This continuous action ensures that precision is maintained through constant data refreshment while productivity is maximized through automated processes that never require breaks or manual intervention, enabling real-time fraud detection across all transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20250184351A1System and method for creating virtual asset wallet address database based on online harmful sites
Publication Date: 2025.06.05 BONANZA FACTORY CO LTD
  • US20250184351A1 patent drawing
  • US20250184351A1 patent drawing
  • US20250184351A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for creating a virtual asset wallet address database based on online harmful sites are disclosed. The system includes: a whitelist collection server for generating a whitelist including virtual asset e-wallet addresses by collecting/analyzing transaction data from cryptocurrency trading sites; a whitelist database server for storing the generated whitelist; a crawling server for performing online resource crawling using predetermined keywords on at least one of a surface web, a dark web, or Telegram; a URL/e-wallet address database server for storing URLs/e-wallet addresses of online resources crawled by the crawl server; an online blacklist analysis server for extracting high-risk virtual asset wallet addresses according to specific criteria by analyzing whitelists stored in the whitelist database server and URL/e-wallet addresses stored in the URL/e-wallet address database server, and for generating a main blacklist including the extracted addresses; and a main blacklist database server for storing the generated main blacklist.