Virtual Barrier Collision Avoidance for V2V Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) safety systems fail to accurately detect potential collisions, especially during lane changes and at intersections, due to limitations in determining precise collision scenarios and lack of proactive collision detection features.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a virtual barrier system around each vehicle, determined by its current state and driver intentions, which uses radar, LIDAR, and cameras to communicate and coordinate with other vehicles to prevent collisions by generating virtual barriers that account for predetermined distances and speeds, and alerting drivers or activating brake systems when overlap is detected.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If current V2V safety systems use basic radar and sensor detection, then the system complexity remains manageable, but the collision detection accuracy is insufficient especially during lane changes and at intersections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the detection space into multiple zones (front, rear, side, blind spot zones) with different sensor configurations and detection priorities. Each zone has dedicated sensors and processing logic, allowing high precision in critical areas without uniformly increasing complexity across the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from traditional 2D radar detection to 3D spatial mapping with virtual barrier construction. By adding the vertical dimension and creating three-dimensional collision scenarios, the system achieves more accurate detection of lane changes and intersection situations while maintaining manageable complexity through modular processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If V2V systems implement comprehensive collision detection algorithms, then the reliability of collision avoidance improves, but the processing time and response speed decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance reliabilityVSAvoidresponse speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates virtual barriers and collision scenarios before actual collisions occur. By establishing predetermined detection zones and pre-processing sensor data into structured collision scenarios, the system reduces real-time computational burden while maintaining high reliability in collision avoidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Each vehicle independently generates its own collision scenarios and virtual barriers based on its sensor data and motion state, without requiring complex centralized processing. This distributed self-service approach reduces overall system processing time while maintaining reliable collision detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the system uses multiple sensors including radar and LIDAR for proactive collision detection, then the safety effectiveness increases, but the cost and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety effectivenessVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different sensor types and densities to different spatial zones based on collision risk. High-risk areas like blind spots and intersection zones use denser sensor configurations including LIDAR, while lower-risk areas use standard radar. This local differentiation improves safety effectiveness where needed without uniformly increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system designs sensors and processing units to serve multiple functions: radar serves both basic collision detection and virtual barrier generation, while LIDAR provides both detailed spatial mapping and collision scenario validation. This multi-functionality reduces the need for dedicated components for each function, managing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If the virtual barrier system coordinates with multiple surrounding vehicles, then the collision avoidance effectiveness improves, but the communication overhead and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance effectivenessVSAvoidcommunication overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential collision-relevant information from multi-vehicle communications, such as relative position, speed, and intended maneuver, rather than exchanging complete sensor datasets. This extraction approach maintains collision avoidance effectiveness while significantly reducing communication overhead and information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances vehicular safety by reducing the likelihood of collisions through proactive notification and intervention, improving cooperative driving and reducing driver distraction by coordinating lane changes and navigation through virtual collision avoidance grids.

Implementation Method 1

uses radar, LIDAR, and cameras to communicate and coordinate with other vehicles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Implementation Method 2

uses radar, LIDAR, and cameras to communicate and coordinate with other vehicles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLIDAR: LIDAR

Data Source

PatentUS11142071B2Systems and methods for improved vehicular safety
Publication Date: 2021.10.12 THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIV OF ARIZONA
  • US11142071B2 patent drawing
  • US11142071B2 patent drawing
  • US11142071B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of a system for improving automobile safety are disclosed.