Virtual Camera Progressive Rendering for 3-D Image Capture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

3-D modeling applications lack the capability to provide sophisticated rendering of complex visual effects like global illumination and shadows in real-time, leading to computationally intensive processes that hinder interactive experiences.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a render engine with an API that receives updates from the 3-D modeling application, utilizing techniques such as ray tracing to progressively refine rendered images, allowing users to capture high-quality images at various stages of refinement through a separate user interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If sophisticated rendering techniques (ray tracing, global illumination) are used to produce high-quality rendered images, then the quality of the rendered image increases, but the rendering time becomes excessively long (minutes)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidrendering time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial rendering actions by allowing users to capture images at intermediate refinement stages rather than requiring complete rendering. The render engine progressively refines the image and allows capture before all visual effects are fully computed, providing a balance between quality and time by accepting that some refinement may be incomplete.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The rendering process is made dynamic by allowing flexible capture timing. Users can intervene at any point during the progressive refinement process to capture the current state, making the rendering workflow adaptable to time constraints and quality requirements rather than following a fixed complete-rendering schedule.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If complete rendering is performed before allowing image capture, then the highest quality image is produced, but the user must wait excessively long before capturing the image

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoiduser interaction convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows users to self-determine the appropriate capture moment based on their own quality requirements and time constraints. Users monitor the progressive refinement process and independently decide when the image quality is sufficient for their needs, eliminating the need to wait for automatic completion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides visual feedback by displaying the progressively refined image to the user during rendering. This allows users to assess image quality in real-time and make informed decisions about when to capture, creating a feedback loop between rendering progress and user judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If the rendering process is interrupted early to allow image capture, then user time is saved, but the image quality may be insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser waiting timeVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows dynamic adjustment of rendering parameters and capture timing. Users can balance time investment against quality requirements by choosing when to capture during the progressive refinement process. The same rendering engine can produce different quality levels depending on how long it runs before capture, allowing parameter optimization based on specific needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If a separate user interface for the render engine is provided, then users can control image capture timing independently, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol flexibilityVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a separate user interface for the render engine that acts as an intermediary between the 3-D modeling application and the user. This dedicated interface simplifies user interaction by providing specialized controls for rendering and capture operations, while the underlying complexity of coordinating with the modeling application is handled through API integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12464252B2Virtual camera for 3-D modeling applications
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 IMAGINATION TECH LTD
  • US12464252B2 patent drawing
  • US12464252B2 patent drawing
  • US12464252B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A user interface to a virtual camera for a 3-D rendering application provides various features. A rendering engine can continuously refine the image being displayed through the virtual camera, and the user interface can contain an element for indicating capture of the image as currently displayed, which causes saving of the currently displayed image. Autofocus (AF) and autoexposure (AE) reticles can allow selection of objects in a 3-D scene, from which an image will be rendered, for each of AE and AF. A focal distance can be determined by identifying a 3-D object visible at a pixel overlapped by the AF reticle, and a current viewpoint. The AF reticle can be hidden in response to a depth of field selector being set to infinite depth of field. The AF and AE reticles can be linked and unlinked, allowing different 3-D objects for each of AF and AE.