Virtual Classroom Breakout Grouping Using ML Productivity Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Optimizing groupings in breakout sessions of virtual classrooms is time-consuming and challenging, as educators face difficulties in balancing student representation and academic levels across groups.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning model is used to determine optimal student groupings based on academic performance data, historical interaction productivity, and instructor-defined settings, ensuring productive outcomes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If students are manually grouped by ability levels or mixed levels, then group composition can be controlled, but the process is time-consuming and non-trivial

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrouping processVSAvoidtime to break students into groups
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic grouping without requiring manual intervention from the instructor. The machine learning model autonomously processes student profiles, academic performances, and interaction data to generate optimized group assignments, eliminating the time-consuming manual grouping process while maintaining controlled group composition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of grouping students is replaced by an automated computational system. The machine learning model substitutes the instructor's manual decision-making process with algorithmic processing of student data, dramatically reducing the time required while preserving the ability to control group composition based on academic levels and interaction dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If groups are mixed with students of all levels, then diverse perspectives are represented, but it becomes difficult to organize students by ability levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegroup composition flexibilityVSAvoidgrouping organization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides dynamic grouping capabilities that can adapt to different instructional needs. The machine learning model can generate different grouping strategies (mixed-ability or same-ability) based on the specific breakout session requirements, assignment type, and instructor preferences, allowing flexible adaptation without increasing organizational complexity for the instructor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of group composition based on different session requirements. By adjusting weights and priorities in the machine learning model, the system can optimize for either diversity of academic levels or homogeneity within groups, depending on the instructional goals and assignment characteristics, thereby managing complexity through parameter adjustment rather than structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If optimal groups are determined using machine learning models, then productivity is maximized, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestudent group productivityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing of student profiles, academic performances, and interaction data before the actual breakout session. The machine learning model is trained in advance on historical data, and student data is preprocessed and stored in ready-to-use formats. This preliminary action reduces the computational complexity during actual session execution while maintaining high productivity optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer between raw student data and group assignment decisions. The machine learning model acts as an intermediary that processes complex multi-dimensional student data (profiles, academic performances, interaction histories) and transforms it into simplified group recommendations that instructors can easily review and implement, thereby managing system complexity through intermediate processing layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12499498B2Using a machine learning model to optimize groupings in a breakout session in a virtual classroom
Publication Date: 2025.12.16 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12499498B2 patent drawing
  • US12499498B2 patent drawing
  • US12499498B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method and a computer program product for optimizing groupings in a breakout session in a virtual classroom. A computer retrieves profiles of students in the virtual classroom, where the profiles of the students include data of academic performances of the students. The computer retrieves a known correspondents archive which includes historic data of productivities correlated to interactions among the students. In response to initialization of the breakout session in the virtual classroom, the computer determines optimal groups that yield most productive results, based on the profiles of the students, the known correspondents archive, and requirements of group settings given by an instructor, using a machine learning model. The computer provides the instructor with the optimal groups. In another embodiment, the computer analyzes context of customized assignments for the breakout session and determines the optimal groups further based on the context to the customized assignments.