Virtual Collision Detection for Distributed Autonomous Components

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In autonomous, distributed production systems, there is a risk of collisions between autonomous components and human workers, which existing technologies fail to adequately prevent due to the complexity of real-time interaction and communication delays between virtual and physical environments.

Innovation Solution

A method is implemented where a virtual image of the autonomous system is created to simulate the movement of components and objects, generating a safety volume around potential hazards, such as humans, to predict and prevent collisions by transmitting feedback data to the real components, allowing them to adjust their movements accordingly, and accounting for communication and processing delays.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a virtual image is used to simulate movements and predict collisions, then collision detection accuracy is improved, but communication and processing delays reduce the effectiveness of real-time collision avoidance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision detection accuracyVSAvoidcommunication and processing delays
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary collision detection by simulating future movements in the virtual image before actual movements occur. The safety corpus is generated in advance based on predicted trajectories, allowing the autonomous component to plan collision-free paths before executing movements in the real environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A virtual copy (digital twin) of the autonomous system is maintained that mirrors the real system's state and environment. This virtual copy allows for rapid simulation and collision detection without affecting real-time operations, effectively decoupling the computational burden from the physical system's response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If safety corpora are generated around objects to define forbidden volumes, then collision prevention is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision preventionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of generating safety corpora around all objects uniformly, the system focuses computational resources on generating corpora around critical objects that pose collision risks. The virtual image identifies and prioritizes objects requiring safety zones based on their movement patterns and potential hazard levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system generates safety corpora selectively for only those objects and time periods where collision risk exists, rather than continuously maintaining corpora around all objects. This partial action approach reduces computational load while maintaining adequate safety coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11358278B2Method for collision detection and autonomous system
Publication Date: 2022.06.14 SIEMENS AG
  • US11358278B2 patent drawing
  • US11358278B2 patent drawing
  • US11358278B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a method for detecting an imminent collision between an object and a component of an autonomous system in the real environment including at least one real, decentralized autonomous component, whereby of at least a part of the autonomous system a virtual image is available, emulating at least one aspect of the autonomous system.