Virtual Data Room Due Diligence With Dynamic Review Controls

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional due diligence processes in both physical and virtual data rooms lack integrity checking, document control, and user interaction tracking, leading to potential tampering of evidence and incomplete reviews, especially in large document sets.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for creating dynamic due diligence items (DDDI) within a virtual data room that requires users to acknowledge or take specific actions before proceeding, ensuring document integrity and tracking user interactions through a virtual data room system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If documents are physically placed into one room with controlled access, then document security and integrity are improved, but the process becomes time-consuming and requires physical travel to the location

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument integrityVSAvoidtime for due diligence
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the physical data room by establishing a virtual environment where documents are stored and accessed electronically. This virtual data room allows multiple users to access documents simultaneously from different locations without needing to physically travel to a centralized room, thereby reducing time loss while maintaining document integrity through virtual security measures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical physical data room system with an electronic virtual system. Instead of physical document storage and controlled access, the system uses electronic document storage, digital access controls, and virtual navigation to achieve the same security goals while eliminating the need for physical travel and reducing time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If multiple users are allowed access to review documents simultaneously, then productivity is improved, but integrity checking and tracking of user interactions becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedue diligence review efficiencyVSAvoidintegrity checking
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism that continuously monitors and records user interactions with documents. The system tracks who viewed what documents, when they accessed them, and provides feedback to administrators about document access patterns. This enables integrity checking while allowing multiple users to work simultaneously, as the system can detect and report on user behavior to ensure proper conduct.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal virtual data room system that serves multiple functions simultaneously: it stores documents, controls access rights, tracks user interactions, provides security monitoring, and enables collaborative review. This multi-functional approach allows multiple users to work together efficiently while the system automatically performs integrity checking through its comprehensive tracking capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If access control is implemented in a physical data room, then document security is improved, but there is no enforcement scheme to ensure documents stay intact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument securityVSAvoidenforcement scheme
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical access control mechanisms with electronic security measures. Instead of physical locks and guards, the system uses digital authentication, user accounts, and software-based access controls to secure documents. The enforcement scheme is automated through the system's ability to monitor digital access, detect unauthorized modifications, and maintain document integrity through electronic means rather than complex physical enforcement mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If documents are physically located and access is controlled, then document integrity is improved, but users must physically travel to the location of the documents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument integrityVSAvoidaccess to documents
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the document storage system that can be accessed from any location. Users interact with digital copies of documents through the virtual data room interface, eliminating the need to physically travel to a centralized location. The virtual environment maintains document integrity through electronic security while providing ease of access through remote connectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12430593B2Due diligence systems and methods
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 NASDAQ INC
  • US12430593B2 patent drawing
  • US12430593B2 patent drawing
  • US12430593B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for performing due diligence on electronically stored documents is provided. A dynamic due diligence item (DDDI) is created by one user and associated with a particular document or piece of information by the system. The created DDDI is assigned to another user. The created DDDI is then routed by the system over a computer network to another user for review of the DDDI and the associated particular document or piece of information. In certain instances, after receiving the notification and opening the document, the system may enforce upon the second user a required action when the DDDI is presented.