Virtual Space Hazard Assessment with Temporal Decay

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Virtual world communities like Second Life lack effective mechanisms to assess and manage hazards posed by avatars and objects, which can lead to uncomfortable or dangerous interactions, and existing systems do not adequately account for the temporal nature of hazardous acts.

Innovation Solution

A virtual-space hazard assessment system that includes a hazard-rating-request receiver, a hazard storage for associating hazard degrees with target information, a mechanism to increase hazard ratings based on user input, and a mechanism to decrease hazard ratings over time, along with output instructions for displaying hazard information, allowing users to avoid hazardous targets and maintain a safe virtual environment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If hazard ratings are increased based on user input to improve safety assessment accuracy, then the reliability of hazard information is improved, but the system becomes vulnerable to malicious rating manipulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard information accuracyVSAvoidmalicious rating manipulation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by monitoring hazard rating patterns and automatically adjusting ratings based on temporal decay and contextual analysis. The hazard-degree decreasing mechanism provides negative feedback that counteracts malicious rating inflation, while the hazard-degree increasing mechanism responds to legitimate user reports, creating a self-regulating system that maintains reliability despite manipulation attempts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the hazard degree parameter over time through automatic decay mechanisms. By adjusting the temporal parameter of hazard persistence, the system reduces the impact of isolated malicious ratings while maintaining sensitivity to sustained legitimate hazard reports, effectively filtering manipulation attempts without compromising overall assessment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If hazard information is continuously updated in real-time to improve safety responsiveness, then the productivity of hazard management is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard management efficiencyVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hazard management system operates autonomously through self-service mechanisms where hazard degrees automatically decay over time without requiring continuous manual intervention. The system self-regulates by processing user inputs and automatically adjusting hazard ratings based on temporal parameters, eliminating the need for complex manual management infrastructure while maintaining real-time responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic hazard assessment through time-based decay mechanisms that automatically reduce hazard degrees at regular intervals. This periodic action maintains up-to-date hazard information without requiring continuous system intervention, simplifying the overall system structure while ensuring real-time safety responsiveness through rhythmic updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If automatic hazard degree reduction is implemented to prevent malicious manipulation, then the system becomes more resilient to attacks, but the ease of operation decreases due to automated processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem resilienceVSAvoidmanual control simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the complex automated hazard management logic from user operations, isolating it as a separate background process. Users simply submit hazard reports without needing to understand or manage the automated rating adjustment mechanisms, while the system independently handles complexity through extracted algorithms for temporal decay and rating manipulation prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS8137203B2System and method for virtual space-hazard assessment
Publication Date: 2012.03.20 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US8137203B2 patent drawing
  • US8137203B2 patent drawing
  • US8137203B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A virtual-space hazard assessment system, for use in a virtual space, having target identifying information that identifies a target that appears in the virtual space. The system includes: a hazard-rating-request receiver for receiving a hazard rating request to rate the degree of hazard of the target; hazard storage for storing a table in which the degree of hazard of the target and the target identifying information are associated with each other; a hazard-degree increasing mechanism for increasing the degree of hazard of the target stored in the table in the hazard storage according to the degree of hazard received by the hazard-rating-request receiver; a hazard-degree decreasing mechanism for decreasing the degree of hazard stored in the table in the hazard storage with the elapse of time; and hazard-information-output instructing mechanism for issuing an instruction to output hazard information stored in the hazard storage.