Virtual Market System for Product Line Prioritization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for prioritizing product development lines are inefficient and costly, as they often rely on time-consuming and expensive meetings between managers and supervisors, which can exclude engineers close to customers and fail to capture the full range of employee feedback.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that equates product development lines to stocks in a future market, allowing selected employees to participate in a trading session, setting rules for operation, and evaluating market trends and purchases to determine priority, thereby enabling anonymous and efficient prioritization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional meetings between managers and supervisors are used to prioritize product development lines, then decisions can be made based on hierarchical authority, but the process becomes costly and time-consuming due to travel arrangements and organization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision authorityVSAvoidmeeting organization time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the decision-making process through an electronic marketplace interface, where participants can express their views on product prioritization without physical presence. This digital replica eliminates travel and meeting organization while preserving the essence of collective decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an electronic marketplace as an intermediary between managers and product prioritization decisions. This mediator allows indirect expression of preferences through virtual trading mechanisms, avoiding the need for direct face-to-face meetings while still capturing collective wisdom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If conventional meetings are used for prioritization, then hierarchical decision-making can occur, but engineers close to customers are excluded from voicing their insights

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehierarchical decision authorityVSAvoidcustomer feedback from engineers
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the participant base into different roles (managers, engineers, customers) who can all independently participate in the electronic marketplace. This segmentation allows engineers close to customers to separately express their insights without being filtered through hierarchical channels, while managers retain their decision authority.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a new dimension to the decision-making process by introducing a virtual trading interface that operates parallel to the hierarchical structure. This additional dimension allows information to flow from engineers to decisions without passing through traditional hierarchical filters, capturing customer feedback that would otherwise be lost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Loss of information

If all employees are allowed to participate in prioritization, then diverse perspectives are captured, but the complexity of managing the process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemployee feedback coverageVSAvoidprocess management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic marketplace enables self-service participation where employees independently express their prioritization preferences through virtual trading actions. The system automatically processes these inputs and generates prioritization results without requiring manual coordination or complex management overhead, thus capturing diverse perspectives while minimizing process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of participation from manual voting or feedback forms to automated virtual trading mechanisms. This parameter change transforms a potentially complex human coordination task into a standardized automated process that can handle many participants simultaneously without proportionally increasing management complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of information

If traditional meeting methods are used, then face-to-face discussion can occur, but the cost of travel and organization increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirect communication qualityVSAvoidtravel and meeting costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of physical travel and face-to-face meetings with an electronic information exchange system. The virtual marketplace interface substitutes physical interaction with digital communication, maintaining the quality of information exchange while eliminating the energy costs associated with travel and in-person meeting organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS7853496B2Prioritizing product development lines
Publication Date: 2010.12.14 COX COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • US7853496B2 patent drawing
  • US7853496B2 patent drawing
  • US7853496B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for maintaining building serviceability information for geographic locations. The disclosed systems and methods may include forming a future market in which the product developments lines are equated to stocks. Furthermore, the disclosed systems and methods may include determining participants in a trading session of the future market and setting rules governing how the trading session in the future market will operate. Moreover, the disclosed systems and methods may include opening the trading session for the participants, closing the trading session for trading and evaluating market session trends and participant purchases to determine the priority of a product line in relation to other product lines.