Virtual Part Probing for Precise Fixture Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional manufacturing methods face challenges in achieving high-accuracy and high-precision part positioning and validation within a working volume, particularly in rapid prototyping and high-mix, low-volume production, due to the need for comprehensive on-machine probing and intermediary calibration.

Innovation Solution

The method involves generating a virtual model of the physical object, creating a probing routine based on this model, and using standardized components and fixture retention positions to validate the physical object's alignment, allowing for repeatable and precise positioning without the need for extensive calibration, thereby decoupling fixturing from toolpath creation and enabling orthogonal variation in fixtures and parts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional on-machine probing and intermediary calibration are used for part positioning and validation, then measurement accuracy is improved, but device complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart positioning accuracyVSAvoidprobing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual model (copy) of the physical assembly that contains all positioning and validation information. This virtual copy replaces the need for complex physical probing systems, as the virtual model can be processed and validated computationally without physical measurement devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical probing systems with a computational approach using virtual models. Instead of using physical probes to measure and validate parts, the system uses software-based validation against the virtual model, eliminating complex mechanical measurement devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive on-machine probing is performed for validation, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly validation accuracyVSAvoidmanufacturing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs validation checks in the virtual model before physical assembly occurs. By validating the virtual assembly first, the system prevents errors before they occur in physical manufacturing, eliminating the need for time-consuming post-assembly probing and rework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The virtual model serves as a digital twin that can be validated instantly without affecting physical production. This copying approach allows comprehensive validation to occur in silico, maintaining high manufacturing precision without slowing down physical productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of manufacture

If standardized components and fixture retention positions are used, then ease of manufacture is improved, but adaptability to different part configurations decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixture assembly simplicityVSAvoidfixture configuration flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a virtual model that can be dynamically reconfigured for different part configurations while maintaining standardized physical fixtures. The virtual representation adapts to various scenarios, allowing the same physical fixture setup to serve multiple purposes through software-based differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The standardized fixtures with retention positions serve multiple functions by working with different part configurations through the virtual model. The universal fixture design, combined with adaptive virtual modeling, allows one physical system to handle diverse manufacturing scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If decoupling fixturing from toolpath creation is implemented, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixturing setup independenceVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent separates the fixturing system from the toolpath creation process by using independent virtual models for each. The fixturing validation occurs in the virtual assembly model, while toolpaths are generated separately based on validated fixture positions, allowing independent optimization and simplification of each subsystem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10976720B2System and method for automated object measurement
Publication Date: 2021.04.13 PLETHORA CORP
  • US10976720B2 patent drawing
  • US10976720B2 patent drawing
  • US10976720B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for automated part probing using a physical machine defining a physical working volume, the method including: generating a virtual model based on a virtual part design received from a user account, the virtual model comprising a virtual part model, based on the virtual part design, virtually fixed to a virtual fixture plate arranged within a virtual working volume representative of the physical working volume; generating a probing routine based on the virtual model; sending the probing routine to the machine; receiving probe outputs from the machine; and validating the virtual model based on the probe outputs.