Virtual Payment Fraud Detection via Transaction Metadata Baseline

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for enhanced security controls to reduce fraud opportunities in virtual payment card transactions, particularly in business-to-business commerce, where internal theft can occur despite the secure nature of virtual cards.

Innovation Solution

A method for fraud detection in repetitive virtual payment card transactions involves establishing a unique payee identification based on their tax identification number (TIN), storing data such as merchant category code, IP address, and geolocation from initial transactions, and validating subsequent transactions against this stored data to detect any discrepancies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If virtual payment cards are used for repetitive transactions to the same payee, then payment efficiency is improved, but fraud risk increases due to potential internal theft

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment efficiencyVSAvoidfraud risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by capturing and storing transaction metadata (IP address, geolocation, merchant category code) during the first authorized transaction. This pre-established baseline enables automatic fraud detection in subsequent transactions without manual intervention, maintaining payment efficiency while preventing fraud through pre-configured validation rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by comparing metadata from each new transaction against the stored baseline from the first transaction. If discrepancies are detected (different IP address, geolocation, or merchant category code), the system automatically denies the transaction and alerts the payment processor, creating a closed-loop fraud prevention mechanism that maintains security while allowing legitimate repetitive transactions to proceed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If fraud detection validation is performed on each transaction, then security is improved, but transaction processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidtransaction processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial validation by checking only critical metadata fields (IP address, geolocation, merchant category code) against the stored baseline, rather than performing comprehensive transaction analysis. This selective approach provides sufficient security for repetitive transactions to the same payee while minimizing processing time overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a copy of the essential transaction metadata (IP address, geolocation, merchant category code) from the first authorized transaction and stores it for comparison. This copied baseline enables rapid validation of subsequent transactions without requiring re-verification of the entire transaction context, thus maintaining security while reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12033155B1System and method for virtual payment fraud detection
Publication Date: 2024.07.09 VPAY INC
  • US12033155B1 patent drawing
  • US12033155B1 patent drawing
  • US12033155B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Like many credit card payments, virtual card payments are subject to fraudulent transactions. To lower this possibility, data collected from a settlement transaction is stored including a merchant category code, a tax identification number, a merchant identification and an IP address of the processing terminal. Subsequent payments from the same payor to the same payee are verified against the previous settlement transaction data to minimize the possibility of fraud.