Virtual Power Plant Site Selection Using Energy Flow Entropy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing research on virtual power plants focuses primarily on economic considerations for device site selection, neglecting safety and energy distribution balance, which affects the stability of the energy network.

Innovation Solution

A multi-device site selection method for integrated energy virtual power plants is developed, using a comprehensive energy flow distribution entropy calculation to optimize device placement and operation, maximizing energy distribution balance through a multi-device site selection optimal planning model that considers power and heat distribution networks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If device site selection focuses on economic considerations only, then cost reduction is improved, but safety and energy distribution balance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy distribution balanceVSAvoidplanning model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces comprehensive energy flow distribution entropy as a new parameter to evaluate energy distribution balance. By changing the evaluation parameter from purely economic indicators to include entropy-based energy distribution metrics, the system achieves better energy balance without significantly increasing planning complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses comprehensive energy flow distribution entropy as an intermediary indicator to bridge economic considerations and energy distribution balance. This intermediary parameter allows the optimization model to simultaneously consider both cost factors and energy balance factors in a unified framework

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If device site selection considers multiple factors including safety and energy balance, then energy distribution balance is improved, but calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidoptimization model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms multiple qualitative considerations (safety, energy balance, stability) into a single quantitative parameter - comprehensive energy flow distribution entropy. This parameter transformation simplifies the optimization model by converting multi-objective optimization into single-objective optimization while maintaining system reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The comprehensive energy flow distribution entropy serves as a universal indicator that simultaneously reflects safety, energy distribution balance, and system stability. This multi-functional parameter allows the optimization model to consider multiple factors through a single metric, reducing model complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If existing planning methods are used, then economic efficiency is improved, but energy network stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeconomic efficiencyVSAvoidenergy network stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates energy flow distribution entropy as a feedback parameter in the optimization model. By continuously evaluating energy distribution balance through entropy calculations and adjusting device placement decisions based on this feedback, the system achieves both economic efficiency and energy network stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the optimization objective from purely economic indicators to include energy flow distribution entropy. This parameter change ensures that economic efficiency is achieved while maintaining energy network stability through entropy-based balance considerations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12118483B2Multi-device site selection method for integrated energy virtual power plant
Publication Date: 2024.10.15 SOUTHEAST UNIV
  • US12118483B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention discloses a multi-device site selection method for an integrated energy virtual power plant, and belongs to the field of virtual power plants. The multi-device site selection method for an integrated energy virtual power plant includes the following steps: constructing a calculation method for calculating a comprehensive energy flow distribution entropy through power flow distribution in a power distribution network and flow distribution in a heat distribution network, to reflect energy distribution balance in an energy network; under a condition that capacity of each device is known, establishing a multi-device site selection optimal planning model of the integrated energy virtual power plant with a goal of maximizing a comprehensive energy flow distribution entropy index; and determining an installation location of each device of the integrated energy virtual power plant in the energy network, and determining an operating state of each device.