Virtual Printing Network for Quality-Matched Textile Orders

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenges of inconsistent product quality, repeatability, and inefficient management of globally distributed manufacturing networks for textile and 3D printing are exacerbated by the lack of global quality standards, trust among strangers, and imbalanced supply and demand, particularly in online customized production.

Innovation Solution

A virtual printing network that connects globally distributed textile and 3D printers through a cloud-hosted system, allowing users to select and control print quality by matching orders with printers based on quality profiles, and enabling bidding and differential pricing based on variable parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If orders are sent to the next available machine on a large network, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to lack of quality consistency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing throughputVSAvoidproduct quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system assigns specific quality profiles to different printers and matches orders to printers based on the quality level required by each order. This ensures that each order is processed by a printer with appropriate capabilities, maintaining quality consistency while utilizing the full network capacity for productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized server acts as an intermediary that receives orders, determines quality requirements, and selects appropriate printers from the network. This mediator coordinates between demand and supply, ensuring quality matching while optimizing resource utilization across the distributed network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If a single system-wide standard is enforced, then manufacturing precision is improved, but adaptability deteriorates due to limitation to specific machines and locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality standard consistencyVSAvoidmachine selection flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system defines quality in terms of adjustable parameters rather than rigid standards. Each printer has a quality profile with specific parameters, and orders can specify required parameter levels. This allows the system to adapt to different machines while maintaining quality control through parameter matching rather than enforcing a single uniform standard.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If printing machines are independently owned and operated, then adaptability is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to lack of trust and coordination among strangers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork participant independenceVSAvoidtransaction trust
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized server acts as a trusted intermediary that coordinates all transactions between independent printer owners and customers. It verifies printer capabilities, matches orders appropriately, and manages the selection process, creating reliability through coordinated oversight while preserving the independence of individual printer owners.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the server receives information about printer status, quality profiles, and performance. This feedback loop enables the server to make informed decisions about order allocation and to maintain reliability by monitoring and coordinating the distributed network of independent printers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If automated order routing is implemented, then productivity is improved, but loss of information increases due to insufficient quality matching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder processing efficiencyVSAvoidquality requirements transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by establishing quality profiles for each printer in advance and storing them in the centralized server. When orders arrive, the server can quickly match them to appropriate printers based on pre-analyzed quality parameters, maintaining both automation efficiency and accurate quality information transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4081891B1Virtual printing network with printer selection means
Publication Date: 2026.04.08 KORNIT DIGITAL LTD
  • EP4081891B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4081891B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4081891B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system for networked printing of images onto textiles where the entity placing an order for printing has no control over the machines carrying out printing, comprises an electronic network and textile printing machines, belonging to different providers, attached to the network. Each of the printing machines has a corresponding printing quality profile of parameters that indicate abilities of the printer to reproduce an image on a textile. An input enables a user to place an order for textile printing of an image and select or define a required printing quality profile. The parameters of the image itself may demand certain printing quality levels. The textile printing order is sent for printing to a textile printing machine on the network that is selected for a printing quality profile which best matches the profile required. Other parameters such as cost, delivery time may also be considered.