Virtual Space Privacy Distance for Selective Information Exposure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In virtual spaces, existing technologies struggle to effectively collect and confirm user experience information due to operator-centered environments, leading to indiscriminate exposure of user information and limited personal privacy protection.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that set a privacy distance for user agents in virtual spaces, filtering information exposure based on this distance, and controlling interactions and information visibility based on user-defined parameters such as purpose, age, and gaze direction, using processors to manage and render the virtual space.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If information is exposed to all users in virtual space, then user experience information can be collected, but personal privacy is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experience information collectionVSAvoidprivacy exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating different privacy zones around user agents in virtual space. Each user agent has a defined privacy distance radius that varies based on relationships with other agents. Information exposure is localized rather than universal - only agents within the privacy distance can access user experience information, and even then only with user permission. This resolves the contradiction by allowing information collection within authorized local zones while maintaining privacy boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the virtual space into multiple privacy zones based on relationship types (e.g., friends, family, strangers) and distance levels. Instead of a single uniform information exposure policy, the system divides access rights into segments - different agents have different levels of access depending on their relationship to the user agent and their position within the privacy distance. This segmentation enables selective information sharing that protects privacy while allowing necessary data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-affected harmful factors

If privacy distance is set to protect personal space, then information exposure is controlled, but interaction opportunities are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidinteraction flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by making the privacy distance configurable and adjustable rather than fixed. Users can modify their privacy distance settings based on different situations, relationships, and contexts. The system dynamically adapts interaction rules - agents can request permission to enter privacy zones, and users can adjust boundaries in real-time. This resolves the contradiction by allowing privacy protection while maintaining interaction flexibility through dynamic boundary adjustment and permission-based access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where agents can request permission to approach or interact within privacy zones. The system provides feedback about current privacy boundaries and interaction status to both users and agents. Users receive notifications about interaction requests and can grant or deny permission, creating a feedback loop that balances privacy protection with interaction needs. This feedback system maintains privacy while allowing versatile interactions when authorized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-affected harmful factors

If selective information filtering is applied, then privacy is enhanced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation exposure controlVSAvoidfiltering mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-defining privacy distance parameters, relationship categories, and default access rules before interactions occur. The system establishes privacy boundaries and filtering criteria in advance based on user profiles and relationship types. When agents enter the virtual space, the filtering mechanism is already configured, reducing the computational complexity of real-time decisions. This preliminary setup enhances privacy control while managing system complexity through pre-computed parameters and rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260044627A1Method and system for providing privacy in virtual space
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 PIAMOND CORP
  • US20260044627A1 patent drawing
  • US20260044627A1 patent drawing
  • US20260044627A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are a method and system for providing privacy in a virtual space. The method of providing privacy in a virtual space includes setting a privacy distance for guaranteeing a personal space of a user agent in a virtual space, and filtering information exposable to the user agent in the virtual space based on the privacy distance.