Virtual Router Proactive Load Balancing via Reinforcement Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional virtual routers in virtualized data centers inefficiently assign processing cores for network traffic, leading to issues like core starvation or overloading, and do not effectively balance network processing loads due to reliance on static or real-time metrics.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a reinforcement learning-based policy model to proactively assign network traffic processing tasks to processing cores based on forecasted traffic loads and attributes, using a reinforcement learning agent to dynamically rebalance workloads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If static or real-time metrics are used for workload assignment, then the system is simple to implement, but load balancing efficiency deteriorates leading to core starvation or overloading

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload balancing efficiencyVSAvoidassignment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary forecasting of network traffic loads using machine learning models before actual workloads arrive. This proactive approach allows the virtual router to pre-assign workloads to processing cores based on predicted traffic patterns, preventing core starvation or overloading before it occurs, thereby improving load balancing efficiency without reacting to already-formed traffic spikes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the reinforcement learning agent continuously monitors actual traffic loads, compares them with forecasted values, and updates the policy model accordingly. This closed-loop control allows the system to learn from past performance and continuously improve assignment decisions, resolving the contradiction between simple implementation and efficient load balancing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If reinforcement learning with forecasted traffic loads is implemented, then load balancing efficiency improves, but computational resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload balancing efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies reinforcement learning selectively rather than continuously - using forecasted traffic loads to make assignment decisions only when significant traffic patterns are predicted, rather than processing every single workload assignment through the full ML pipeline. This partial application reduces computational overhead while maintaining the load balancing benefits where they are most needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

Traffic load forecasting is performed in advance using historical data and patterns, allowing the system to prepare assignment decisions before actual traffic arrives. This preliminary computation spreads the computational burden over time rather than concentrating it during peak traffic periods, reducing instantaneous resource consumption while maintaining high load balancing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If proactive rebalancing is performed, then processing bottlenecks and latencies are reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork processing reliabilityVSAvoidrebalancing mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The virtual router implements self-service capabilities through the reinforcement learning agent that automatically monitors traffic patterns, makes assignment decisions, and performs rebalancing without external intervention. The system serves itself by detecting imbalances and correcting them autonomously, which improves reliability while keeping the control mechanism relatively simple through automation rather than complex manual management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from actual traffic measurements to trigger proactive rebalancing only when necessary. By continuously monitoring core utilization and comparing it against target thresholds, the system activates rebalancing mechanisms selectively rather than continuously, improving reliability while avoiding the complexity of constant active management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250208892A1Proactive load balancing of network traffic processing for workloads
Publication Date: 2025.06.26 JUNIPER NETWORKS INC
  • US20250208892A1 patent drawing
  • US20250208892A1 patent drawing
  • US20250208892A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In general, techniques are described for a computing system comprising processing circuitry having access to a storage device. The processing circuitry is configured to apply, by a reinforcement learning agent, a policy model to a forecasted network traffic load associated with a workload to assign the workload to a first processing core of a plurality of processing cores of a computing device. The processing circuitry is also configured to process, by a virtual router and based on the assignment of the workload to the first processing core, network traffic for the workload using the first processing core.