Virtual Scenario Generation for Autonomous Machine Coverage Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems for testing autonomous vehicles fail to provide an intuitive method for defining a wide range of scenarios and variations, leading to incomplete and error-prone manual scenario creation, which hinders effective verification and validation of safety-critical system behavior.

Innovation Solution

A declarative description approach using first-order logic allows for automated generation of virtual environment scenarios, enabling the system to create meaningful representatives and variations without manual coding, and automatically fill in undefined criteria, thereby providing an end-to-end solution for scenario definition and evaluation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If scenarios are manually defined and coded in conventional systems, then specific test cases can be created, but the ability to comprehensively cover all possible scenarios and variations is limited and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescenario coverage completenessVSAvoidmanual coding complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically generates scenarios and variations by having the computational engine interpret high-level test objectives and autonomously create detailed scenario instances, eliminating the need for manual coding of each scenario while ensuring comprehensive coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of test objectives and safety-critical requirements to pre-generate comprehensive scenario libraries that cover all possible test cases before actual testing begins, ensuring complete coverage without manual intervention during testing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If each scenario variation is manually defined, then specific test cases can be created, but the scalability to test millions of scenarios is hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescenario generation speedVSAvoidscenario definition ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The computational engine automatically generates millions of scenario variations by interpreting high-level test objectives and autonomously creating detailed scenario instances, enabling rapid scenario generation without manual coding effort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system generates scenario variations by systematically changing parameters such as weather conditions, traffic patterns, vehicle states, and environmental factors based on predefined ranges and distributions, enabling scalable generation of millions of scenarios from a single test objective

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If conventional module-level testing is used, then individual components can be verified, but end-to-end evaluation of safety-critical system behavior is ineffective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveend-to-end system validationVSAvoidtesting framework complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The simulation framework serves multiple functions simultaneously: it generates scenarios, executes end-to-end tests, collects performance data, and validates safety-critical behavior across the entire autonomous vehicle system, replacing multiple separate testing processes with a unified approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12566905B2Virtual environment scenarios and observers for autonomous machine applications
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 NVIDIA CORP
  • US12566905B2 patent drawing
  • US12566905B2 patent drawing
  • US12566905B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In various examples, scenarios may be defined using a declarative description—e.g., defining a behavior of interest—that the present system may convert into a procedural description for generating one or more instances and/or variations of a scenario for testing an autonomous or semi-autonomous machine in a virtual environment. The system may execute observers or evaluators for testing the performance and accuracy of the machine and may compute coverage of various elements based on the generated virtual scenarios, and may feed the results back to the system to generate additional instances and/or variations where the coverage or accuracy is below a desired level. As a result, the system may include an end-to-end framework for generating scenarios in virtual environments, testing and validating the scenarios themselves, and/or testing and validating the underlying autonomous or semi-autonomous systems of the machine—all based on a declarative description.