Machine Fault Detection via Virtual Sensors for Unobserved Wear

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for error detection in mechanical systems, such as hydraulically driven machines, are inefficient in detecting anomalies in unobserved quantities that cannot be directly measured, leading to potential failures due to lack of visibility into system components like friction and leakage, which are not accessible during regular operation.

Innovation Solution

An iterative estimation method combining physical models with sensors and virtual sensors to estimate unobserved quantities, allowing for early detection of anomalies by analyzing deviations in wear parameters using distance measures like Mahalanobis distance, implemented in local computing units like PLCs, reducing computational effort and enabling continuous error detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If machine learning-based models are used for error detection, then detection capability is improved, but computational effort and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection capabilityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a physical model as an intermediary between sensor measurements and error detection. This physical model serves as a simplified mediator that translates complex system behavior into manageable relationships, avoiding the need for computationally intensive machine learning models while maintaining effective error detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex computational systems (machine learning models) with a simpler physical model-based approach. By substituting the mechanical/computational complexity of neural networks with a more straightforward physical model that processes sensor data, the system achieves error detection with minimal computational effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If sensors are installed to measure all system parameters, then measurement completeness is improved, but system cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem state visibilityVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies of physical sensors through mathematical models. Instead of installing physical sensors to measure unobserved variables like friction and leakage, the system computes virtual sensor readings from the physical model and available measurements, providing complete system state visibility without additional physical hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The physical model acts as an intermediary that bridges the gap between limited sensor measurements and complete system state knowledge. It mediates between the available sensor data and the unmeasured system parameters, deriving information about friction, leakage, and wear without requiring direct physical measurement of these quantities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If physical models are used for estimation, then computational effort is reduced, but ability to detect anomalies in unobserved variables is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational effortVSAvoidanomaly detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual sensor copies that specifically target unobserved variables like friction and leakage. These virtual sensors are mathematical constructs derived from the physical model that provide precise estimates of parameters that would be difficult or impossible to measure directly, enabling anomaly detection in previously inaccessible system aspects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentEP4357866A1Method for detecting errors in a machine system
Publication Date: 2024.04.24 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP4357866A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4357866A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4357866A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for fault detection in a machine system, comprising acquiring (110) measured values ​​for one or more measured variables of the system; performing (120) an iterative estimation method (42, 46, 50) using the measured values ​​to determine an estimate for a system state that includes at least one unobserved variable (22, 24, 26, 28, 44, 48, 52) of the system, wherein the iterative estimation method is based on a physical model of the system, and wherein the model includes at least one interaction of the at least one unobserved variable with the one or more measured variables; and applying (140) anomaly detection, wherein a fault of the system is detected (160) when an anomaly of the at least one unobserved variable is detected.