Layered Vehicle Control Using Virtual Signals for Autonomous Earthmovers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing earth-moving construction and mining vehicles face limitations in autonomous operations due to limited sensed data, inability to handle on-site obstacles, and the need for bulky and expensive hardware systems, hindering fully autonomous operations and coordination between multiple vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A configurable system with a machine interface, emulator, and adaptive control system that mimics physical control signals using virtual signals, enabling fully autonomous operations and coordination, even in the presence of obstacles, while preserving the original operating ability of the vehicles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If limited autonomous operations are implemented using existing techniques, then some automation capability is achieved, but the system requires bulky and expensive hardware

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous operations capabilityVSAvoidhardware system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies of physical control components (joysticks, pedals, switches) that exist purely in software. These virtual controls replicate the functionality and signal patterns of physical controls without requiring physical hardware, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining automation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical control system with a software-based control system. Instead of relying on physical joysticks, pedals, and switches connected to hardware controllers, the system uses virtual controls that generate control signals through software, substituting mechanical components with computational equivalents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If physical control components are used for autonomous operations, then direct control capability is maintained, but the system cannot perform fully autonomous operations without human interaction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol capabilityVSAvoidfully autonomous operation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces virtual control components as an intermediary layer between the operator and the vehicle's physical controls. This intermediary software layer can generate control signals autonomously based on sensor data and control logic, while still being able to receive and process signals from physical controls when needed, enabling both autonomous and manual operation modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The virtual control system is designed to perform multiple functions: it can operate autonomously based on sensor input, it can respond to physical control inputs from operators, and it can coordinate multiple vehicles. This multi-functionality allows the system to adapt to different operational requirements without requiring separate control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Extent of automation

If existing autonomous techniques are used, then basic automation is achieved, but coordination between multiple vehicles is not possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebasic automation capabilityVSAvoidmulti-vehicle coordination capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The virtual control system is designed with universal communication capabilities that enable it to function independently for basic automation while also facilitating coordination between multiple vehicles. The system can exchange control signals and operational data with other vehicles equipped with similar virtual control systems, enabling cooperative operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If physical control systems are used, then direct hardware control is available, but the system lacks adaptability to different control configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol signal reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol configuration flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The virtual control system is dynamically configurable through software, allowing control configurations to be changed without physical modifications. The system can adapt to different control schemes, vehicle types, and operational requirements by loading different virtual control definitions and signal mappings, while maintaining reliable control signal generation through standardized interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12523012B1Configurable system for layered system control of earth-moving construction and/or mining vehicles
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 AIM INTELLIGENT MACHINES INC
  • US12523012B1 patent drawing
  • US12523012B1 patent drawing
  • US12523012B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and techniques are described for a configurable system for layered control of earth-moving construction and/or mining vehicles. For example, the systems and techniques may inject signals into a variety of physical button and lever conditions to allow for a machine emulator to virtually mimic the physical button and lever conditions.