Autonomous Vehicle Virtual Stop Line for Crosswalk Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles lack effective methods to safely navigate through crosswalks by considering future traffic signals, leading to potential risks for pedestrians and passengers, especially in congested areas where current methods only consider current traffic signal states.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous driving apparatus that receives traffic signal information via V2X technology, determines whether a vehicle can pass through a crosswalk based on this information and its own driving data, and generates a virtual stop line if it cannot, controlling the vehicle to avoid crossing this line.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If autonomous vehicles use only current traffic signal states for decision-making, then the control system is simple, but safety is compromised due to inability to predict future signal changes

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by receiving and processing future traffic signal information in advance, predicting signal changes before they occur. This allows the vehicle to plan deceleration and stopping actions proactively, improving safety while maintaining manageable system complexity through advance preparation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies beforehand cushioning by generating virtual stop lines that create a safety buffer zone before actual crosswalks. This cushioning approach allows the vehicle to decelerate gradually and stop safely, preventing potential collisions with pedestrians while accounting for future traffic signal changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Reliability

If the vehicle decelerates to stop before crosswalks for all future red signals, then pedestrian safety is improved, but traffic efficiency decreases due to unnecessary stopping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepedestrian safetyVSAvoidtraffic efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by adaptively adjusting deceleration decisions based on real-time analysis of future traffic signal information, vehicle speed, position, and timing. Rather than rigidly stopping for all future red signals, the system dynamically determines when stopping is necessary versus when maintaining speed is safe and efficient

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by considering multiple variables including time to crosswalk, vehicle speed, distance to stop line, and predicted signal change timing. By analyzing these parameters comprehensively, the system optimizes the balance between safety and efficiency, stopping only when necessary rather than universally

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If the system considers future traffic signals and generates virtual stop lines, then vehicle control precision is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle control precisionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies segmentation by dividing the road into distinct zones using virtual stop lines. This segmentation approach simplifies control logic by creating clear decision boundaries - the vehicle needs to stop before the virtual line if a future red signal is predicted, eliminating the need for complex continuous control calculations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The virtual stop line acts as an intermediary element between the traffic signal information and the vehicle's braking system. This intermediary simplifies the control architecture by translating complex future signal predictions into a simple spatial boundary that the vehicle either stops before or crosses, reducing computational burden

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20230316910A1Method and apparatus for controlling vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.10.05 42DOT INC
  • US20230316910A1 patent drawing
  • US20230316910A1 patent drawing
  • US20230316910A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a method and apparatus for controlling a vehicle, the method including receiving traffic signal information, determining whether or not a vehicle passes through a crosswalk, on the basis of the traffic signal information and driving information of the vehicle, in response to determining that the vehicle does not pass through the crosswalk, generating a virtual stop line, and controlling the vehicle not to cross the virtual stop line.