Virtual Vehicle Tagging Using Mobile Sensor Fingerprints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining vehicle use by a driver often rely on user input, which may not accurately reflect actual usage, leading to inconsistencies in policies such as insurance rates.

Innovation Solution

A method using a mobile device with sensors like accelerometers and magnetometers to collect data, which is processed by a machine-learning model to identify the vehicle in use, allowing for accurate tracking of vehicle usage patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If user input is used to determine vehicle use, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses sensor data from the mobile device to automatically identify vehicle usage without requiring user input. The machine learning model processes accelerometer, magnetometer, and GPS data to self-determine whether the device is in a vehicle and which vehicle, eliminating the need for manual user reporting while improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of manual user input with an automated sensor-based detection system. Mobile device sensors (accelerometer, magnetometer, GPS) and machine learning algorithms substitute for human reporting, transforming the process from user-driven to system-driven vehicle usage identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If sensor data collection is implemented to identify vehicle use, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent leverages the mobile device's existing multi-functional sensors (accelerometer, magnetometer, GPS) that serve multiple purposes. These sensors are already part of the device for other functions, and the system repurposes them for vehicle usage identification, avoiding additional hardware complexity while improving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model acts as an intermediary that processes raw sensor data and translates it into meaningful vehicle usage information. This intermediary layer simplifies the complexity by automatically handling data processing and interpretation, making the system manageable despite using multiple sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If machine-learning models are trained with sensor measurements, then productivity is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidloss of time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by continuously collecting and pre-processing sensor data in the background, even when the device is not actively being used for vehicle identification. This allows the machine learning model to be pre-trained and ready for rapid vehicle usage determination, improving productivity while minimizing perceived time loss for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous data collection and processing, maintaining the useful action of vehicle usage identification constantly rather than on-demand. Sensors continuously monitor the environment, and the machine learning model continuously processes data, ensuring that vehicle usage information is always available without requiring additional time when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12518199B2Virtual tagging of vehicles
Publication Date: 2026.01.06 CAMBRIDGE MOBILE TELEMATICS INC
  • US12518199B2 patent drawing
  • US12518199B2 patent drawing
  • US12518199B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are disclosed for virtual tagging of vehicles that include generating an association between a user of a mobile device and the mobile device. The techniques include receiving a first set of measurements from one or more sensors of the mobile device while the mobile device is positioned in a first vehicle during a trip and training a machine-learning model using the first set of measurements. The techniques further include receiving a second set of measurements from the one or more sensors of the mobile device and determining, by executing the machine-learning model using the third set of measurements, that the mobile device is positioned in the first vehicle or a second vehicle.