Virtual Welding System with Real-Time Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional welding simulations are limited in providing realistic training for arc welding, focusing mainly on muscle memory and offering unrealistic visual and audio feedback, which does not adequately replicate the real-world welding experience, thus lacking the necessary feedback for students to make adjustments for a good weld.

Innovation Solution

A virtual welding system that includes a programmable processor-based subsystem, spatial tracker, and mock welding tools with adapters that simulate different welding types, providing real-time visual feedback of a weld puddle with molten metal fluidity and heat dissipation characteristics, allowing users to adjust their technique in a realistic virtual environment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If real welding systems and materials are used for training, then training realism and feedback quality are improved, but resource consumption and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining feedback realismVSAvoidwelding materials consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the welding environment that replicates the visual and sensory characteristics of real welding. The system uses computer-generated imagery to simulate the welding arc, molten metal pool, and surrounding environment, providing realistic training feedback without consuming physical welding materials. This virtual replication allows students to practice extensively without the resource constraints of real welding operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Quantity of substance

If welding simulations are used to conserve resources, then material consumption is reduced, but training realism and feedback quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding materials consumptionVSAvoidtraining feedback realism
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates multiple feedback mechanisms that provide realistic training information. Visual feedback includes dynamic rendering of the welding arc, molten metal pool behavior, and weld bead formation. The system also provides auditory feedback simulating real welding sounds and haptic feedback through the mock welding tool to replicate the tactile sensations of actual welding operations, thereby maintaining training realism while using minimal physical materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If fixed welding training systems are used, then training quality is maintained, but portability and accessibility decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining consistencyVSAvoidsystem portability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The training system is divided into modular components including a portable mock welding tool, a compact computing system, and a display device. This segmentation allows the complete training system to be easily transported between locations while maintaining full training functionality. Each module can be independently configured and assembled, enabling deployment in various training environments from classrooms to field locations without compromising training consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9836994B2Virtual welding system
Publication Date: 2017.12.05 LINCOLN GLOBAL INC
  • US9836994B2 patent drawing
  • US9836994B2 patent drawing
  • US9836994B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that are not different from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal language of the claims.