Virtual Workspace Representation for Inventory Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inventory systems face challenges in efficiently adapting to changes due to complex interactions between physical and virtual components, leading to inefficiencies, downtime, and high costs, especially as they grow in complexity and capacity.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a virtual representation of the inventory system that allows for seamless updates and changes without pausing operations, by managing a virtual representation of the workspace and updating it in tandem with physical changes, minimizing disruption and enabling decentralized control of resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the inventory system expands capacity and complexity, then the system can handle more inventory tasks, but the cost of incremental changes and the difficulty of adapting to modifications increase prohibitively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem adaptabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the inventory management into modular functional units (receiving modules, storage modules, picking modules, etc.) that can be independently configured and scaled. Each module operates with standardized interfaces, allowing the system to expand capacity by adding modular components rather than redesigning the entire system, thus improving adaptability while managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic task assignment and resource allocation algorithms that automatically adjust to changing inventory requirements. The control system dynamically optimizes picking paths, assigns tasks to available workers or robots, and reconfigures workflows in real-time, enabling the system to adapt to capacity changes without proportional increases in operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the inventory system responds to large numbers of diverse requests, then customer service improves, but resource utilization becomes inefficient leading to longer response times and backlogs

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary task batching and route optimization before execution. Incoming inventory requests are aggregated and pre-processed into optimized picking sequences, and pick paths are calculated in advance based on current warehouse state. This preliminary preparation reduces the complexity of real-time decision-making during order fulfillment, improving both throughput and resource utilization efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual resource allocation and task assignment with automated control algorithms and software-based optimization. The centralized control system uses computational algorithms to optimize resource distribution, task assignment, and workflow coordination, substituting mechanical/manual coordination with intelligent software control that handles diverse requests more efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the inventory system makes significant changes to infrastructure and equipment, then capacity or functionality can be modified, but system downtime increases and economic losses occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem flexibilityVSAvoidsystem downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs configuration changes, software updates, and module deployments during low-activity periods or in a staged manner that maintains operational continuity. New functional modules can be prepared and validated in test environments before being integrated into the live system, allowing capacity modifications without requiring complete system shutdowns, thus reducing downtime and economic losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10860978B1Nondisruptive workspace representation deployment for inventory systems
Publication Date: 2020.12.08 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10860978B1 patent drawing
  • US10860978B1 patent drawing
  • US10860978B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods described herein pertain to maintaining a virtual representation of a workspace in a material handling system and updating the virtual representation without downtime. Methods described include maintaining an initial virtual representation of a material handling grid, receiving an updated virtual representation, and generating and implementing an intermediate virtual representation that does not conflict with the initial virtual representation. Methods further include, upon determining that the intermediate virtual representation is performing without conflicts, deploying the updated virtual representation to replace the intermediate virtual representation without halting operations in the workspace. Multiple intermediate virtual representations can be generated to allow for complex changes, and the deployments performed in series.