Virtualization Layer Recovery OS for Network Connectivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing virtualization systems fail to maintain external network connectivity when a guest OS is compromised by malware, as the virtualization layer cannot communicate externally if the guest OS crashes or is disabled, leading to a loss of network connectivity and inability to alert administrators.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a hypervisor-based architecture that transitions from a compromised guest OS to a recovery OS, allowing the virtualization layer to reassign network resources and boot a second virtual machine with a recovery OS to restore external network connectivity and report malicious events, even if the guest OS is non-functional.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the guest OS is used to control network connectivity, then the system can operate with a single OS, but external network connectivity is lost when the guest OS is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexternal network connectivityVSAvoidvirtualization architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments network control into two independent virtual machines: a guest OS VM for normal operations and a recovery OS VM for maintaining network connectivity. This segmentation ensures that compromise of the guest OS does not affect the recovery OS's ability to maintain external network connectivity, resolving the reliability issue while keeping the virtualization architecture manageable through clear functional separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The recovery OS virtual machine is prepared in advance with pre-configured network connectivity capabilities and necessary system components. This preliminary action ensures that when the guest OS is compromised, the recovery OS can immediately take over network control without requiring complex real-time configuration changes, thus maintaining reliability without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If the guest OS is allowed full control, then ease of operation is improved, but security against malware is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguest OS controlVSAvoidmalware impact
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The virtualization layer acts as an intermediary between the guest OS and the physical hardware, including network interfaces. This intermediary can monitor guest OS operations, detect malware behavior, and control hardware access independently of the guest OS state. The recovery OS serves as a mediator to maintain network connectivity and enable security operations even when the guest OS is compromised, thus improving security without significantly impacting ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different levels of control and monitoring to different components: the guest OS receives full control for ease of operation, while the virtualization layer and recovery OS implement targeted security measures specifically for network connectivity and malware detection. This local quality approach allows high ease of operation for legitimate operations while providing focused security where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If network resources are dedicated to the guest OS, then resource allocation is simplified, but network connectivity is lost when guest OS fails

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork connectivityVSAvoidresource management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic resource allocation where network resources can be reassigned between the guest OS VM and recovery OS VM based on operational needs. The virtualization layer dynamically manages resource distribution, allowing the recovery OS to access network resources when the guest OS is compromised. This dynamic approach maintains reliability through automatic failover while keeping resource management complexity manageable through automated virtualization orchestration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The virtualization layer is designed with universal resource management capabilities that can serve multiple functions: normal resource allocation to the guest OS, malware detection, and recovery operations. This multi-functionality allows the same infrastructure to handle both routine operations and security incidents without requiring separate dedicated systems, thus improving reliability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11113086B1Virtual system and method for securing external network connectivity
Publication Date: 2021.09.07 MAGENTA SECURITY HOLDINGS LLC
  • US11113086B1 patent drawing
  • US11113086B1 patent drawing
  • US11113086B1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, a computing device comprises one or more hardware processor and a memory coupled to the one or more processors. The memory comprises software that supports a virtualization software architecture including a first virtual machine operating under control of a first operating system. Responsive to determining that the first operating system has been compromised, a second operating system, which is stored in the memory in an inactive (dormant) state, is now active and controlling the first virtual machine or a second virtual machine different from the first virtual machine that now provides external network connectivity.