Virtualization Software Lifecycle Management via Release Units

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The lifecycle management of virtualization software in computing systems is cumbersome and error-prone due to inter-dependencies between software components, making it difficult to make piecemeal changes, track the current state of software configurations, and ensure compliance with desired states, especially during upgrades.

Innovation Solution

A desired state model is introduced where virtualization software components are grouped into release units managed separately, allowing for independent creation and shipping with proper naming and versioning, enabling end-users to specify a desired state through a software specification that composites a hierarchical software stack, including a base image, add-ons, firmware, and solutions, ensuring compatibility and easy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If software components are tightly integrated with inter-dependencies, then system reliability is improved, but lifecycle management complexity increases and piecemeal changes become difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidlifecycle management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the virtualization software into independent Software Installation Bundles (SIBs), each representing a discrete, versioned component. This segmentation allows individual SIBs to be updated, added, or removed without affecting the entire system, thereby reducing lifecycle management complexity while preserving system reliability through controlled dependencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a dynamic software composition model where the virtualization software image is assembled at installation time by selecting and combining specific versions of SIBs based on a software bill of materials (SBOM). This dynamic approach enables flexible lifecycle management where individual components can be independently updated by modifying the SBOM, without requiring complete system reinstallation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple software vendors and OEMs contribute components, then software functionality and adaptability are improved, but tracking and managing the current state of software configurations becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware functionalityVSAvoidsoftware configuration state
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a comprehensive feedback mechanism through the SBOM, which automatically tracks and records the exact version, vendor, and dependency information of each SIB in the virtualization software image. This feedback system provides real-time visibility into the software configuration state, enabling users to answer questions about current software composition and ensuring compliance with desired states through automated comparison and reporting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Stability of the object's composition

If software releases are tightly controlled with bulletins and integrated ISO images, then system stability is improved, but ease of making piecemeal changes and upgrades is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidease of making changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables partial updates by allowing users to specify and apply only the necessary SIBs from a bulletin or update package, rather than requiring complete system reinstallation. This partial action approach maintains system stability through controlled integration while significantly improving ease of operation by enabling selective, piecemeal changes to the virtualization software image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Adaptability or versatility

If solutions are enabled to provide discrete features, then software versatility is improved, but compatibility conflicts and upgrade complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware versatilityVSAvoidupgrade complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary compatibility checking and dependency resolution during the software image assembly phase, before deployment. The SBOM pre-validates that selected SIBs are compatible with each other and with the base image version, and pre-resolves any dependency conflicts. This preliminary action eliminates compatibility issues before they manifest during upgrades, reducing upgrade complexity while maintaining solution versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11435996B2Managing lifecycle of solutions in virtualization software installed in a cluster of hosts
Publication Date: 2022.09.06 VMWARE INC
  • US11435996B2 patent drawing
  • US11435996B2 patent drawing
  • US11435996B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of installing an image of a virtualization software in a cluster of hosts includes: in response to a user input, generating a software specification that specifies a base image of the virtualization software and a solution to be enabled; retrieving metadata of the base image, metadata of the solution, and a constraint of the solution; generating a desired image of the virtualization software based on the metadata of the base image and the metadata of the solution in accordance with the constraint; and instructing each host in the duster to install the desired image of the virtualization software.