Virtualized Breach Scenario Graphs for Vulnerability Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing anti-malware software is ineffective against sophisticated malware threats, as malicious users continually find ways to circumvent these protections, necessitating a new system and method for securing computing systems against vulnerabilities.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilizes simulator nodes to emulate operations of devices, simulate malicious actions, and determine their success, configuring security systems based on these simulations, and updating breach scenarios to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional anti-malware software is used to protect computing systems, then basic malware blocking is achieved, but sophisticated malware threats continue to circumvent these protections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalware protection effectivenessVSAvoidresponse to sophisticated threats
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by simulating malicious actions in a controlled virtual environment before they can affect the actual target system. The simulator nodes execute simulated malware and attack scenarios to identify vulnerabilities and test security responses in advance, allowing the system to prepare defenses before real threats materialize.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces simulator nodes as intermediary elements between the actual target system and potential malicious actions. These simulator nodes act as mediators that replicate attack conditions and security infrastructure in a virtual layer, enabling analysis of threat responses without direct exposure to harmful operations on the production system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If simulator nodes are allocated to emulate device operations and simulate malicious actions, then vulnerability detection capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevulnerability detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates copies of target system components, networks, and security infrastructure as virtual simulator nodes. These copies replicate the essential characteristics and behaviors of the original system elements, enabling vulnerability simulation and detection without requiring direct access to or modification of the actual complex production environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the complex target system into discrete simulator nodes that can be independently allocated, configured, and executed. Each simulator node represents a specific device, network segment, or security component, allowing the overall complex system to be broken down into manageable simulation units that can be orchestrated as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If breach scenarios are simulated and analyzed to identify vulnerabilities, then security improvement is achieved, but time consumption for analysis and remediation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity protection levelVSAvoidanalysis and remediation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous simulation and analysis operations through automated execution of breach scenarios. The simulator nodes continuously test security responses, vulnerability conditions, and attack paths without interruption, allowing security analysis to proceed continuously rather than in periodic batches, thereby reducing overall time to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where simulation results automatically feed back into vulnerability identification and remediation processes. Analysis of simulated breach outcomes provides immediate feedback on security effectiveness, enabling automated adjustment of security configurations and prioritization of remediation tasks based on actual simulation performance data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250363220A1System and method for creating and executing breach scenarios utilizing virtualized elements
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 SAFEBREACH LTD
  • US20250363220A1 patent drawing
  • US20250363220A1 patent drawing
  • US20250363220A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for analyzing a computing system for potential breach points, the system comprising a memory device having executable instructions stored therein, and a processing device, in response to the executable instructions, configured to parse a breach scenario file, the breach scenario file comprising a graph including action component nodes connected by edges, determine a root node from the action component nodes, execute the root node with breach point data, generate a root node return value based on the execution of the root node, the root node return value including a modified copy of the breach point data, determine children nodes from the action component nodes connected to the root node, execute the children nodes wherein each execution of the children nodes produces children node return values for a subsequent one of the children nodes, and return a final return value from the execution of the children nodes.