Temperature-Sensitive Viscoelastic Fracturing Fluids for Formation Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fracturing fluids face challenges such as high leak-off rates, high costs, slow viscosity recovery, and damage to subterranean formations due to the use of high-concentration polymer and surfactant systems, which hinder efficient hydrocarbon recovery and proppant transport.

Innovation Solution

A fracturing fluid composition with a hydrophobically associative polymer (HAP) and a surfactant having a critical solution temperature (CST) between 30° C. and 150° C., allowing for temperature-sensitive viscosity and reduced surfactant levels, enabling efficient hydration, proppant transport, and minimized formation damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If high-concentration polymer systems are used to achieve sufficient fluid viscosity for proppant transport, then proppant carrying capability is improved, but formation damage and residual gel plugging increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid viscosityVSAvoidformation damage
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical nature of the viscosity-providing agent from high-molecular-weight polymers to low-molecular-weight viscoelastic surfactants. This parameter change allows achieving the same or better viscosity at much lower concentrations, thereby reducing formation damage while maintaining proppant transport capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite micellar structures formed by viscoelastic surfactants that self-assemble into worm-like micelles. These micellar networks provide the necessary viscosity and elasticity without requiring high concentrations of individual components, thus avoiding formation damage associated with traditional polymer systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-affected harmful factors

If viscoelastic surfactant systems are used to reduce polymer concentration and formation damage, then formation damage is reduced, but leak-off rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformation damageVSAvoidfluid leak-off rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the chemical structure of surfactant molecules to include both hydrophilic and hydrophobic segments, creating viscoelastic surfactants that can form structured micellar networks. This structural parameter change enables the fluid to achieve both low formation damage and controlled leak-off rate by balancing surfactant concentration and micellar network strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional VES systems are used to achieve low formation damage, then formation damage is reduced, but viscosity recovery time after high shear increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformation damageVSAvoidviscosity recovery time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the molecular architecture of the surfactant to create viscoelastic surfactants with optimal hydrophilic-lipophilic balance. This parameter optimization enables rapid micelle reformation and viscosity recovery after shear degradation, reducing the time loss while maintaining low formation damage characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the dynamic self-assembly and disassembly properties of viscoelastic surfactant micelles. The micellar networks can rapidly reorganize after shear stress is removed, providing fast viscosity recovery. This dynamic behavior allows the fluid to adapt its viscosity in real-time without permanent damage to the formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a cost-effective, rapidly hydratable fracturing fluid with improved proppant transport properties and reduced damage to subterranean formations, maintaining stability at high shear rates and temperatures, facilitating efficient hydrocarbon recovery.

Implementation Method 1

Viscoelastic surfactant molecules, when present at a sufficient concentration, can aggregate into overlapping worm- or rod-like micelles, which confer the necessary viscosity to the fluid to carry the proppant during fracturing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMicelle formation: Colloid

Implementation Method 2

a surfactant having a critical solution temperature (CST) of between about 30° C. and 150° C., wherein the viscosity of the fracturing fluid composition is temperature sensitive

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCritical solution temperature (CST): Phase Change

Implementation Method 3

One class of polymers which interact particularly strongly with surfactants is the class of hydrophobically modified water-soluble polymers. Since contact between the hydrophobic groups and water is unfavorable, these polymers have a strong tendency to self-associate and/or to associate with surfactants

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrophobic association: Hydrophobe

Data Source

PatentUS9228123B2Temperature sensitive viscoelastic well-treatment fluids
Publication Date: 2016.01.05 CHAMPIONX USA INC
  • US9228123B2 patent drawing
  • US9228123B2 patent drawing
  • US9228123B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is directed to fracturing fluids having temperature-sensitive viscosities. The fracturing fluids may include a mixture of a hydrophobically associative polymer (HAP) and a surfactant in an aqueous medium, wherein the surfactant imparts a critical solution temperature (CST) to the fluid. The fluid is more viscous at temperatures lower than the CST as compared to temperatures above the CST.