Vision-Based Conveyor Flow Management for Parcel Density Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional conveyor systems face inefficiencies due to imbalances and variability in parcel flow, leading to reduced throughput and increased equipment investment, as they struggle to maintain optimal gap spacing and density for effective sorting and singulation.

Innovation Solution

A vision-based bulk parcel flow management system using cameras to monitor belt area utilization and parcel count, controlling conveyor speeds to maximize occupancy and density, dynamically adjusting input flow and spacing to optimize conveyor area utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional conveyor systems control articles to have gaps close to desired length, then sorting effectiveness is improved, but throughput decreases due to excessive spacing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting effectivenessVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts conveyor speed based on real-time vision system feedback about article positions and gaps. The conveyor speed is not fixed but varies continuously to optimize both gap spacing for sorting and throughput for productivity, resolving the contradiction between reliable sorting and high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A vision system continuously monitors article positions and gap lengths, providing feedback to the control system. This closed-loop feedback enables the system to maintain optimal gap spacing while maximizing throughput by adjusting conveyor speed in real-time based on actual conditions rather than relying on fixed predetermined spacing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If maximum parcel density is achieved at induction points, then throughput is maximized, but gap control and sorting effectiveness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidgap control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The conveyor system operates with dynamic speed variation along its length and in response to real-time conditions. High-density packing is maintained while dynamic speed adjustments ensure proper gap formation before sorting points, resolving the contradiction between maximum throughput and reliable gap control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The conveyor system is divided into multiple independently controlled zones or sections. Each zone can operate at different speeds to simultaneously achieve high density in some areas while maintaining proper spacing in sorting-critical areas, resolving the contradiction between throughput maximization and gap control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If variable speed control is implemented to optimize gap spacing, then sorting performance improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting performanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex mechanical gap control mechanisms with a vision-based detection system and electronic control. Instead of mechanical devices to physically maintain gaps, the system uses optical sensing and electronic speed regulation, reducing mechanical complexity while improving sorting performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The vision system and control algorithm automatically detect article positions and adjust conveyor speed without human intervention. The system self-regulates to maintain optimal gap spacing, reducing the need for complex manual control mechanisms and simplifying operation while improving sorting performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If more conveyors are added to handle flow variability, then throughput capacity increases, but equipment investment and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethroughput capacityVSAvoidequipment investment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding more conveyors to handle flow variability, the system uses dynamic speed control on existing conveyors. The ability to vary speed in real-time allows a single conveyor to handle a wider range of flow conditions, replacing the need for multiple parallel conveyors and reducing equipment investment while maintaining throughput capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9771222B2Vision based conveyor package flow management system
Publication Date: 2017.09.26 FIVES INTRALOGISTICS CORP
  • US9771222B2 patent drawing
  • US9771222B2 patent drawing
  • US9771222B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A camera based vision system that recognizes and maximizes belt area utilization. A plurality of cameras are positioned at flow entry points of feed conveyors and at the singulator. The control algorithm recognizes individual items area, the rate at which individual objects are passing, and the area utilization of the collector belt. The video camera and computer based conveyor package management system monitor and control the number and size of the packages present on the infeed conveyors, collector conveyor, singulator conveyor and sorting conveyor in a package handling system wherein the camera data is used to measure the available area or space on the conveyors to maintain a desired density of packages on selected conveyor(s). The conveyor speed is controlled as a function of occupancy on a collector or just prior to a singulator or receiver.