Vision-Language Model Instruction Tuning via Multimodal Cross-Attention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Building general-purpose vision-language models is challenging due to rich input distributions and task diversity resulting from additional visual input, which affects the accuracy and efficiency of image-text understanding tasks.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a vision-language model framework that employs a multimodal encoder to encode images with cross-attention to text instructions, generating instruction-aware image representations that are more focused and efficient, combined with a large language model to generate responses, reducing the need for extensive training and fine-tuning of the base LLM.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a general-purpose vision-language model is trained to handle rich input distributions and task diversity, then the model's versatility and adaptability improve, but the training complexity and computational resources required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask diversity handlingVSAvoidtraining complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The model is segmented into distinct components: a frozen pre-trained language model and a trainable vision encoder. This segmentation allows the complex vision-language task to be divided into separate training stages, where the language model remains fixed while only the vision encoder is trained on diverse visual inputs, reducing overall training complexity while maintaining versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The language model is pre-trained on large-scale text data before being used in the vision-language task. This preliminary action enables the model to already possess strong language understanding capabilities, so that during the vision-language training phase, only the vision encoding needs to be adapted to handle diverse input distributions, rather than training the entire model from scratch

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If extensive training and fine-tuning is performed on the base LLM to improve vision-language task performance, then the model's accuracy on these tasks improves, but the memory usage and training time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask accuracyVSAvoidmemory usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The training requirement is extracted and isolated to only the vision encoder component, while the base LLM remains frozen and unchanged. This extraction allows the model to achieve improved vision-language task accuracy through targeted training of the visual processing component alone, avoiding the need to allocate memory resources for fine-tuning the entire large language model

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The base LLM is pre-trained on extensive text data before being deployed for vision-language tasks. This preliminary training establishes strong language foundations, so that during vision-language adaptation, only the vision encoder requires training, significantly reducing the memory and computational resources needed compared to training the full model

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If the model processes all visual information comprehensively to improve understanding accuracy, then the quality of image-text understanding improves, but the computational efficiency and processing speed decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunderstanding accuracyVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The vision encoder is designed to process visual information with localized attention to relevant regions and features. Rather than uniformly processing all visual data, the model focuses computational resources on extracting and encoding the most salient visual features needed for the specific language task, achieving accurate understanding while maintaining processing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The model adjusts the parameterization of visual feature extraction to match the specific requirements of different language tasks. By changing how visual parameters are encoded and transformed based on the task at hand, the model achieves comprehensive understanding accuracy while optimizing computational efficiency for each specific application

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240160858A1Systems and methods for vision-language model instruction tuning
Publication Date: 2024.05.16 SALESFORCE INC
  • US20240160858A1 patent drawing
  • US20240160858A1 patent drawing
  • US20240160858A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments described herein provide a method of generating a vision-language task output to a text instruction relating to an input image, the method comprising receiving, via a data interface, the input image and the text instruction comprising an instruction relating to the image. The method further includes encoding, via an image encoder, the image into a first image representation. The method further includes generating, by a multimodal encoder, a second image representation based on cross-attending the first image representation to the text instruction. The method further includes generating, by a neural network based language model, a vision-language task output in response to the text instruction based on an input combining the second image representation and the text instruction.