Functional Vision Mobility Testing Across Low Illumination Levels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a lack of validated and regulatorily accepted mobility/maze tests for measuring functional outcomes in subjects with degenerative retinal diseases beyond patients with RPE 65 mutations, particularly for conditions like retinitis pigmentosa (RP), limiting the precision in assessing changes in contrast and illumination during maze navigation.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for testing functional vision involving a subject navigating preprinted courses with varying illumination levels and obstacles, using a video recording and analysis to determine critical illumination levels (CIL) and maximum step speeds (MSS) through a series of courses with controlled lighting and obstacle configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a mobility test is used to measure functional vision in subjects with retinal dystrophies, then functional outcome measurement is achieved, but measurement precision is insufficient due to lack of validated parameters for contrast and illumination changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying illumination levels (13 discrete levels from 0.12 to 500 lux spaced by 0.3 log units) and contrast levels (multiple preprinted courses with different contrast values) to create a standardized mobility test protocol. This allows precise measurement of functional vision by determining the critical illumination level at which navigation performance deteriorates, thereby resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple illumination levels are tested to determine critical illumination level, then measurement precision improves, but testing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having subjects complete practice trials at the highest illumination level before formal testing begins. This practice session familiarizes subjects with the maze navigation task and reduces learning effects during actual testing, thereby improving measurement precision without proportionally increasing testing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic action by testing at 13 discrete illumination levels rather than continuous variation. This periodic sampling approach efficiently captures the critical illumination level where performance deteriorates, balancing measurement precision with acceptable testing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If standardized courses with obstacles are used, then reliability of testing improves, but device complexity increases due to multiple courses and obstacle configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the mobility test into multiple standardized courses, each with specific contrast levels and obstacle configurations. This segmentation allows systematic assessment of navigation performance under different visual conditions while maintaining reliability through standardization, managing complexity through modular course design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies universality by designing a single standardized mobility test system that can assess multiple vision functions (contrast sensitivity, visual field, depth perception, visual acuity) across different illumination levels. This multi-functional approach improves reliability through comprehensive assessment while avoiding the complexity of multiple separate testing devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12502063B2Low luminance mobility test
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 JCYTE INC
  • US12502063B2 patent drawing
  • US12502063B2 patent drawing
  • US12502063B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to systems and methods for testing functional vision of a subject. The systems and methods utilize a plurality of obstacle courses, a plurality of contrast levels of the obstacle courses, a plurality of illumination levels, video-recording, and a robust scoring algorithm to assess the mobility of the subject.