VISTA MRI Sampling Using Gradient Descent for Temporal Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current MRI sampling methods, such as Poisson-disk sampling, struggle to maintain consistent temporal resolution and incoherence in heterogeneous domains, leading to inefficiencies and inconsistent results due to variable sampling density and sensitivity to system imperfections.

Innovation Solution

The Variable Density Incoherent Spatiotemporal Acquisition (VISTA) method addresses these issues by using a gradient descent approach to distribute samples uniformly across k-space, ensuring constant temporal resolution, fully-sampled time-averaged k-space, and controlling eddy currents, while allowing for precise distribution of samples.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If Poisson-disk sampling is used to achieve uniform coverage and incoherence, then sampling uniformity is improved, but temporal resolution consistency deteriorates in heterogeneous domains

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling uniformityVSAvoidtemporal resolution consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the sampling pattern adaptive rather than static. The VISTA method dynamically adjusts the sampling distribution across different time frames while maintaining a consistent number of samples per frame, allowing the system to adapt to temporal variations while preserving temporal resolution consistency. This is achieved through an iterative optimization process that enforces temporal constraints during sampling pattern generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the sampling density parameter across different regions of k-space while maintaining a fixed number of samples per time frame. By varying the spatial distribution parameters rather than the temporal sampling rate, the method achieves both uniform coverage and consistent temporal resolution. The variable density weighting function modifies sample probability density without altering the temporal sampling structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If random sampling is used to achieve incoherence, then incoherence is improved, but result consistency deteriorates due to large gaps or clustering

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveincoherenceVSAvoidresult consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms purely random sampling into pseudo-random sampling by introducing a variable density weighting function that modifies the probability distribution of sample locations. This parameter change ensures that while samples remain randomly distributed (maintaining incoherence), their density is regulated to prevent excessive gaps or clustering. The weighting function acts as a constraint that shapes the random distribution without eliminating its incoherent properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through an iterative optimization process that evaluates the sampling pattern and adjusts it to meet both incoherence and consistency requirements. The method calculates metrics such as sample density distribution and incoherence measures, then refines the sampling pattern accordingly. This feedback loop ensures that the final sampling pattern achieves the desired balance between incoherence and result consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If pseudo-random sampling is used to regulate gaps between samples, then sampling uniformity is improved, but flexibility in incorporating domain-specific constraints deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling uniformityVSAvoidconstraint incorporation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the sampling method dynamic and adaptable by allowing different constraint types to be incorporated through the optimization framework. The VISTA method can enforce various domain-specific constraints such as fixed temporal resolution, fully-sampled time-averaged k-space, and controlled eddy currents by modifying the objective function and constraints in the iterative optimization process. This dynamic adaptability maintains sampling uniformity while accommodating diverse application requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the sampling design into multiple independent constraint components that can be individually enforced. The method separates spatial uniformity requirements from temporal resolution requirements and other domain-specific constraints, allowing each to be addressed independently through the optimization process. This segmentation enables flexible incorporation of different constraints without compromising overall sampling uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If high acceleration rates are used to reduce acquisition time, then productivity is improved, but image quality and artifact levels deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacquisition speedVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the sampling density parameter across k-space regions to optimize image quality at high acceleration rates. By using variable density sampling that concentrates samples in central k-space regions while reducing density in peripheral regions, the method maintains image quality even with reduced total samples. This parameter change allows higher acceleration rates without proportional degradation of image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating sampling density across different regions of k-space. The central region receives higher sampling density to preserve image quality and reduce artifacts, while peripheral regions receive lower density. This localized quality adjustment allows the system to achieve high acceleration rates while maintaining critical image quality metrics through selective sampling distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9939509B2Variable density incoherent spatiotemporal acquisition (VISTA) for highly accelerated magnetic resonance imaging
Publication Date: 2018.04.10 OHIO STATE INNOVATION FOUND
  • US9939509B2 patent drawing
  • US9939509B2 patent drawing
  • US9939509B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pseudo-random, incoherent sampling technique, called Variable density Incoherent Spatiotemporal Acquisition (VISTA) is disclosed, which is based on minimal Riesz energy problem. Compared with other pseudorandom methods (e.g., PDS), VISTA has the unique ability to incorporate a variety of problem-specific constraints. In this study, VISTA was applied to real-time CMR, where it not only provided an incoherent sampling with variable density but also ensured a constant temporal resolution and a fully sampled time-averaged data.