Visual Fault Identification in PLC Manufacturing Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Complex manufacturing systems controlled by PLCs often experience faults that are difficult to quickly identify and locate, leading to increased system downtime and delayed ramp-up due to cryptic fault messages and lack of visual information.

Innovation Solution

A method that stores visual representations of devices and associates them with fault messages, allowing for the rapid visualization and identification of faults by displaying 3D CAD views and related data, enabling operators to determine the root cause of faults without external references.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional fault code display methods are used, then the system structure remains simple, but fault identification becomes difficult and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault identification easeVSAvoiddowntime
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a visual copy of the physical manufacturing system using 3D CAD models and virtual representations. These visual copies display fault information and component locations, allowing operators to identify problems without physically inspecting each component. The virtual model replicates the actual system layout, enabling rapid fault localization through visual inspection rather than time-consuming physical troubleshooting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a visual display system as an intermediary between the fault condition and the operator. Instead of directly presenting cryptic fault codes, the system uses graphical interfaces, 3D models, and visual indicators to mediate the communication of fault information. This intermediary layer translates technical fault data into intuitive visual representations that operators can quickly interpret and act upon.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If detailed fault information is provided, then fault diagnosis accuracy improves, but information processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault location precisionVSAvoidinformation processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments fault information into hierarchical levels of detail. The system first presents high-level fault categories and affected system areas, then allows progressive drilling down to specific components only when needed. This segmentation enables precise fault location without overwhelming operators with all possible details simultaneously, reducing information processing complexity while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different levels of information detail to different regions of the visual display based on their relevance to the current fault. Affected components and critical pathways receive detailed information and highlighting, while unrelated system areas display minimal or no fault information. This local quality approach concentrates processing resources on relevant areas, improving precision without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS7433801B2Identifying and visualizing faults in PLC-based manufacturing systems
Publication Date: 2008.10.07 FORD MOTOR CO
  • US7433801B2 patent drawing
  • US7433801B2 patent drawing
  • US7433801B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Textual fault messages in PLC-based manufacturing systems are supplemented by automatically displayed sets of information that allow an operator to quickly identify, recognize and visualize components responsible for producing faults. Visual display of stored computer generated images showing system components and tooling allow the operator to visually pinpoint the exact component responsible for the fault, and its location within the manufacturing system. Stored information associated with the component producing the fault, such as installation date, vendor sources, replacement part inventory, programming logic and editing software, is also automatically recalled and displayed along with the fault message to aid fault diagnosis and correction.