Visual Instruction Tuning With Pre-Selection for Multimodal LLMs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Visual instruction tuning (VIT) for large vision-language models is computationally expensive due to reliance on costly human annotations or paid services like Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT), limiting users with constrained resources from creating custom VIT datasets.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for Pre-Instruction Data Selection (PreSel) that estimates task importance and selects a subset of high-quality unlabeled images for instruction generation, using k-means clustering and neighbor centrality to reduce computational complexity and overhead.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If instructions are generated for all images in the dataset using human annotations or paid services like GPT, then the visual instruction tuning quality is improved, but the computational cost and time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstruction tuning qualityVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary clustering and importance weighting on the full image dataset before instruction generation. By pre-organizing images into clusters and calculating task importance weights, the system identifies a representative subset of images that will yield high-quality instruction tuning without requiring instructions for all images, thus reducing computational time while maintaining quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of generating instructions for all images in the dataset, the system selectively generates instructions only for a representative subset of images identified through clustering and importance weighting. This partial action approach maintains instruction tuning quality by ensuring coverage of diverse visual concepts while significantly reducing the computational burden of instruction generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Adaptability or versatility

If instructions are generated for all images using paid services like GPT, then comprehensive task coverage is improved, but the computational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask coverageVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the image dataset into multiple clusters based on visual features and task characteristics. Each cluster represents a specific category or type of visual content. By generating instructions only for representative images from each cluster rather than all images, the system achieves comprehensive task coverage across all segments while reducing overall computational cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of image selection from 'all images' to 'representative subset based on clustering and importance weights'. This parameter change allows the system to maintain diverse task coverage by ensuring representation from multiple clusters while significantly reducing the number of images requiring expensive instruction generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a subset of images is selected for instruction generation using clustering methods, then computational complexity is reduced, but the selection process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational complexityVSAvoiddata preparation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by automatically performing clustering, calculating task importance weights, and selecting representative images without requiring manual curation or complex configuration. The automated pipeline uses unsupervised learning methods to organize images and identify representatives, making the process easier to execute despite the sophisticated algorithms involved

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20260065650A1Data-efficient visual instruction tuning for multimodal large language models
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20260065650A1 patent drawing
  • US20260065650A1 patent drawing
  • US20260065650A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one aspect, instruction tuning may include generating a set of instructions for a reference set of images selected from a set of images based on one or more task specific instruction generation protocols, generating one or more task importance weights for the reference set of images based on the set of instructions and the reference set of images and a ratio of a first loss of a first loss function associated with a response and an image from reference set of images and a second loss of a second loss function associated with the response, a question, and the image from reference set of images, and generating a set of instructions for a remaining set of images from the set of images based on one or more of the task importance weights, k-means clustering, and neighbor centrality from a cluster of the k-means clustering.