Visual KYC Verification Templates for Interactive Procedure Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Programming verification procedures for know-your-client (KYC) requirements consume significant power and processing resources due to multiple cycles of coding and debugging.

Innovation Solution

Implementing visual interfaces that allow for constructing verification procedures and user interfaces (UIs) to conserve memory space, power, and processing resources by enabling real-time testing of verification procedures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional coding and debugging cycles are used to implement verification procedures, then verification functionality can be achieved, but significant power and processing resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveverification procedure functionalityVSAvoidpower consumption

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses visual templates that serve as graphical copies or representations of verification procedures. Instead of writing actual code, users configure verification logic through visual template selection and parameter setting, which generates the necessary code automatically. This copying approach eliminates manual coding cycles and reduces processing resources while maintaining full verification functionality.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical coding process with a visual configuration system. Users interact with graphical templates and drag-and-drop interfaces instead of writing code, thereby substituting the manual mechanical act of coding with an automated visual system that generates code behind the scenes, reducing both power consumption and processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If traditional coding and debugging cycles are used to implement verification procedures, then verification functionality can be achieved, but processing resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveverification procedure functionalityVSAvoidprocessing resources

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements verification procedures through pre-configured visual templates that encapsulate common verification logic. Users select from predefined templates and configure specific parameters, rather than coding from scratch. This preliminary preparation of verification patterns eliminates multiple coding and debugging cycles, significantly reducing processing resources while ensuring reliable verification functionality.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses template copying where standardized verification procedure patterns are reused across different implementations. Instead of coding each verification procedure independently, the system copies and adapts proven templates, reducing processing resources by avoiding redundant coding and debugging work while maintaining functional reliability.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #26Copying

3Use of energy by moving object

If visual interfaces are used to construct verification procedures, then memory space and power are conserved, but the complexity of the interface system increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidinterface system complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the verification procedure construction into modular visual templates, each handling a specific verification task. This segmentation allows users to assemble complex verification procedures from simple, standardized building blocks through visual configuration, reducing the need for extensive memory and power while managing interface complexity through organized modularity.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If multiple cycles of coding and debugging are performed, then verification procedures can be implemented, but time is lost

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveverification procedure implementationVSAvoidcoding and debugging time

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses pre-configured visual templates that encapsulate verified verification logic. Users configure specific parameters visually rather than coding from scratch, eliminating multiple iterative coding and debugging cycles. This preliminary preparation of verification patterns ensures reliable implementation while dramatically reducing the time required to deploy verification procedures.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250285153A1Programming verification templates visually

Publication Date: 2025.09.11 PLAID INC

AI summary

In some implementations, a verification device may generate a first set of radio buttons associated with a first verification procedure and provide the first set of radio buttons in an area associated with a verification template. The verification device may receive a selection of a configuration for the first verification procedure using the first set of radio buttons. The verification device may generate a second set of radio buttons associated with a second verification procedure and provide the second set of radio buttons in the area associated with the verification template. The verification device may receive a selection of a configuration for the second verification procedure using the second set of radio buttons. Accordingly, the verification device may generate instructions for generating a set of user interfaces based on the selection of the configuration for the first verification procedure and the selection of the configuration for the second verification procedure.