Visual Mapping of Aggregate Causal Frameworks for Scientific Literature

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current academic search tools, such as Google Scholar, often provide incomplete or overly inclusive search results due to their reliance on keyword-based relevance ranking, which can lead to researchers duplicating findings or drawing incorrect conclusions, and lack visualization of the underlying constructs and relationships in scientific literature.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for searching and visualizing knowledge-based models that parse language in scientific and academic literature to extract construct relationships, using natural language processing and machine learning to identify variables and causal roles, and generate visual representations like construct maps and relationship maps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If keyword-based search is used to find relevant literature, then search coverage is improved, but search precision deteriorates due to incomplete or overly inclusive results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch coverageVSAvoidsearch precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer between keyword search and literature results by extracting and visualizing construct relationships. Instead of directly ranking papers by keyword match, the system parses abstracts to identify constructs and their relationships, then maps papers to these constructed knowledge models. This intermediary representation layer enables more precise filtering and visualization of relevant literature while maintaining broad search coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical keyword-matching system with a semantic understanding system that parses natural language to extract construct relationships. Instead of relying on simple text overlap and boolean operators, the system uses natural language processing to understand the meaning and relationships between concepts in literature abstracts, enabling more accurate relevance assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If comprehensive search criteria are used to avoid missing relevant literature, then search completeness is improved, but time consumption increases due to reading through irrelevant literature

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch completenessVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds a new dimension to literature search by visualizing construct relationships graphically. Instead of presenting flat lists of papers ranked by keyword relevance, the system creates visual maps showing how constructs and relationships are organized across literature. This dimensional transformation enables researchers to quickly assess the scope and structure of relevant literature without reading each paper, maintaining completeness while reducing time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by automatically parsing and structuring construct relationships from literature abstracts before the researcher needs to review the literature. The system pre-extracts constructs, identifies relationships, and organizes papers into visual knowledge models in advance, so when researchers conduct their review, the heavy lifting of semantic analysis has already been completed, saving them significant time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If keyword-based search is used, then ease of operation is improved, but information completeness deteriorates due to inability to characterize underlying constructs and relationships

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidinformation completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the search system multi-functional by combining keyword-based retrieval with automated construct relationship extraction and visualization. The same system that searches for papers by keyword also parses abstracts to identify constructs, maps relationships between them, and generates visual representations. This universal system maintains the ease of keyword search while adding the information completeness of semantic analysis without requiring separate tools or complex procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11989239B2Visual mapping of aggregate causal frameworks for constructs, relationships, and meta-analyses
Publication Date: 2024.05.21 POL GRATIANA DENISA
  • US11989239B2 patent drawing
  • US11989239B2 patent drawing
  • US11989239B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for extracting from the scientific, technical and academic literature constructs and causal relationships between such constructs, searching said literature and visualizing its contents in the form of aggregated maps centered around constructs and relationships of interest, the maps including construct maps, relationship maps, model maps, and meta-analysis maps.